Literature DB >> 33747944

Identification of Stemness Characteristics Associated With the Immune Microenvironment and Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.

Deli Mao1, Zhijun Zhou2, Shenglei Song1, Dongsheng Li1, Yulong He1, Zhewei Wei3, Changhua Zhang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly heterogeneous disease. In recent years, the prognostic value of the mRNA expression-based stemness index (mRNAsi) across cancers has been reported. We intended to identify stemness index-associated genes (SI-genes) for clinical characteristic, gene mutation status, immune response, and tumor microenvironment evaluation as well as risk stratification and survival prediction.
METHODS: The correlations between the mRNAsi and GC prognosis, clinical characteristics, gene mutation status, immune cell infiltration and tumor microenvironment were evaluated. Weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to identify SI-genes from differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was employed to calculate the sample SI-gene-based ssGSEA score according to the SI-genes. Then, the correlations between the ssGSEA score and GC prognosis, clinical characteristics, gene mutation status, immune cell infiltration and tumor microenvironment were analyzed. Finally, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression algorithm was used to construct a prognostic signature with prognostic SI-genes. The ssGSEA score and prognostic signature were validated using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database.
RESULTS: The mRNAsi could predict overall survival (OS), clinical characteristics, the gene mutation status, immune cell infiltration, and the tumor microenvironment composition. Fourteen positive SI-genes and 178 negative SI-genes were screened out using WGCNA. The ssGSEA score, similar to the mRNAsi, was found to be closely related to OS, clinical characteristics, the gene mutation status, immune cell infiltration, and the tumor microenvironment composition. Finally, a prognostic signature based on 18 prognostic SI-genes was verified to more accurately predict GC 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS than traditional clinical prediction models.
CONCLUSION: The ssGSEA score and prognostic signature based on 18 prognostic SI-genes are of great value for immune response evaluation, risk stratification and survival prediction in GC and suggest that stemness features are crucial drivers of GC progression.
Copyright © 2021 Mao, Zhou, Song, Li, He, Wei and Zhang.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastric cancer; immune response; prognostic signature; stemness index; tumor microenvironment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33747944      PMCID: PMC7966731          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.626961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


  46 in total

1.  Assessing the Clinical Impact of Risk Prediction Models With Decision Curves: Guidance for Correct Interpretation and Appropriate Use.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr; Marshall D Brown; Kehao Zhu; Holly Janes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Verteporfin targeting YAP1/TAZ-TEAD transcriptional activity inhibits the tumorigenic properties of gastric cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Julie Giraud; Silvia Molina-Castro; Lornella Seeneevassen; Elodie Sifré; Julien Izotte; Camille Tiffon; Cathy Staedel; Hélène Boeuf; Solène Fernandez; Philippe Barthelemy; Francis Megraud; Philippe Lehours; Pierre Dubus; Christine Varon
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  JAM-C is an apical surface marker for neural stem cells.

Authors:  Sandra Stelzer; Maik M A Worlitzer; Lamia'a Bahnassawy; Kathrin Hemmer; Kirité Rugani; Inga Werthschulte; Anna-Lena Schön; Benjamin F Brinkmann; Eva C Bunk; Thomas Palm; Klaus Ebnet; Jens C Schwamborn
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Mutant p53 induces a hypoxia transcriptional program in gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nilay Sethi; Osamu Kikuchi; James McFarland; Yanxi Zhang; Max Chung; Nicholas Kafker; Mirazul Islam; Benjamin Lampson; Abhishek Chakraborty; William G Kaelin; Adam J Bass
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-08-08

5.  Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; Jean-Charles Soria; Marcin Kowanetz; Gregg D Fine; Omid Hamid; Michael S Gordon; Jeffery A Sosman; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Scott N Gettinger; Holbrook E K Kohrt; Leora Horn; Donald P Lawrence; Sandra Rost; Maya Leabman; Yuanyuan Xiao; Ahmad Mokatrin; Hartmut Koeppen; Priti S Hegde; Ira Mellman; Daniel S Chen; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Cancer stemness, intratumoral heterogeneity, and immune response across cancers.

Authors:  Alex Miranda; Phineas T Hamilton; Allen W Zhang; Swetansu Pattnaik; Etienne Becht; Artur Mezheyeuski; Jarle Bruun; Patrick Micke; Aurélien de Reynies; Brad H Nelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The macrophage-related biomarkers sCD163 and sCD206 are released by different shedding mechanisms.

Authors:  Marlene Christina Nielsen; Morten Nørgaard Andersen; Nikolaj Rittig; Sidsel Rødgaard-Hansen; Henning Grønbaek; Søren Kragh Moestrup; Holger Jon Møller; Anders Etzerodt
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.962

8.  A stemness-related ZEB1-MSRB3 axis governs cellular pliancy and breast cancer genome stability.

Authors:  Anne-Pierre Morel; Christophe Ginestier; Roxane M Pommier; Olivier Cabaud; Emmanuelle Ruiz; Julien Wicinski; Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran; Valérie Combaret; Pascal Finetti; Christelle Chassot; Christiane Pinatel; Frédérique Fauvet; Pierre Saintigny; Emilie Thomas; Caroline Moyret-Lalle; Joël Lachuer; Emmanuelle Despras; Jean-Luc Jauffret; François Bertucci; Jérôme Guitton; Anne Wierinckx; Qing Wang; Nina Radosevic-Robin; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; David G Cox; Frédéric Hollande; Stéphane Ansieau; Julie Caramel; Daniel Birnbaum; Arnaud M Vigneron; Agnès Tissier; Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret; Alain Puisieux
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Clinical significance of putative markers of cancer stem cells in gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xiao-Long Chen; Xin-Zu Chen; Yi-Gao Wang; Du He; Zheng-Hao Lu; Kai Liu; Wei-Han Zhang; Wei Wang; Chang-Chun Li; Lian Xue; Lin-Yong Zhao; Kun Yang; Jian-Ping Liu; Zong-Guang Zhou; Jian-Kun Hu; Xian-Ming Mo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-20
View more
  4 in total

1.  Characterization of stem cell landscape and identification of stemness-relevant prognostic gene signature to aid immunotherapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hang Zheng; Heshu Liu; Huayu Li; Weidong Dou; Jingui Wang; Junling Zhang; Tao Liu; Yingchao Wu; Yucun Liu; Xin Wang
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 8.079

2.  Identification of a Four-Gene-Based SERM Signature for Prognostic and Drug Sensitivity Prediction in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Xiya Jia; Bing Chen; Ziteng Li; Shenglin Huang; Siyuan Chen; Runye Zhou; Wanjing Feng; Hui Zhu; Xiaodong Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  A nine-consensus-prognostic -gene-based prognostic signature, recognizing the dichotomized subgroups of gastric cancer patients with different clinical outcomes and therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Dan Ji; Yang Yang; Fei Zhou; Chao Li
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Comprehensive Analysis of an Individualized Immune-Related lncRNA Pair Signature in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Chuang Nie; Jiabao Zhai; Qi Wang; Xiaojie Zhu; Guanghui Xiang; Chang Liu; Tianyu Liu; Wanyu Wang; Yimin Wang; Yashuang Zhao; Wenjing Tian; Yingwei Xue; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.