Literature DB >> 16222230

Encoding a temporally structured stimulus with a temporally structured neural representation.

Stacey L Brown1, Joby Joseph, Mark Stopfer.   

Abstract

Sensory neural systems use spatiotemporal coding mechanisms to represent stimuli. These time-varying response patterns sometimes outlast the stimulus. Can the temporal structure of a stimulus interfere with, or even disrupt, the spatiotemporal structure of the neural representation? We investigated this potential confound in the locust olfactory system. When odors were presented in trains of nearly overlapping pulses, responses of first-order interneurons (projection neurons) changed reliably, and often markedly, with pulse position as responses to one pulse interfered with subsequent responses. However, using the responses of an ensemble of projection neurons, we could accurately classify the odorants as well as characterize the temporal properties of the stimulus. Further, we found that second-order follower neurons showed firing patterns consistent with the information in the projection-neuron ensemble. Thus, ensemble-based spatiotemporal coding could disambiguate complex and potentially confounding temporally structured sensory stimuli and thereby provide an invariant response to a stimulus presented in various ways.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16222230     DOI: 10.1038/nn1559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  70 in total

Review 1.  Insect olfactory coding and memory at multiple timescales.

Authors:  Nitin Gupta; Mark Stopfer
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Autonomous head-mounted electrophysiology systems for freely behaving primates.

Authors:  Vikash Gilja; Cindy A Chestek; Paul Nuyujukian; Justin Foster; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Classification of odorants across layers in locust olfactory pathway.

Authors:  Pavel Sanda; Tiffany Kee; Nitin Gupta; Mark Stopfer; Maxim Bazhenov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings.

Authors:  John P Cunningham; Byron M Yu
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Techniques for extracting single-trial activity patterns from large-scale neural recordings.

Authors:  Mark M Churchland; Byron M Yu; Maneesh Sahani; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Gaussian-process factor analysis for low-dimensional single-trial analysis of neural population activity.

Authors:  Byron M Yu; John P Cunningham; Gopal Santhanam; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy; Maneesh Sahani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and discriminate odors depends upon odor sampling time and concentration.

Authors:  Geraldine A Wright; Michelle Carlton; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Encoding of mixtures in a simple olfactory system.

Authors:  Kai Shen; Sina Tootoonian; Gilles Laurent
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Frequency transitions in odor-evoked neural oscillations.

Authors:  Iori Ito; Maxim Bazhenov; Rose Chik-ying Ong; Baranidharan Raman; Mark Stopfer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Neural correlates of behavior in the moth Manduca sexta in response to complex odors.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Riffell; H Lei; John G Hildebrand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.