Literature DB >> 16214479

Femoral neck-shaft angle in extra-capsular proximal femoral fracture fixation; does it make a TAD of difference?

N P Walton1, H Wynn-Jones, M S Ward, J A Wimhurst.   

Abstract

The effect of femoral neck-shaft angle and implant type on the accuracy of lag screw placement in extra-capsular proximal femoral fracture fixation was investigated. Radiographs of all extra-capsular proximal femoral fractures seen in one unit over 18 months were reviewed. Of 399 cases, 307 (237 female, 70 male) were included in the study as they had no contra-lateral proximal femoral metal work. Femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA) of the uninjured hip and magnification adjusted tip-apex distance (TAD) of femoral head lag screw were measured. Type of fixation implant was 135 degrees classic hip screw (CHS) (n=144) or 130 degrees intra-medullary hip screw (IMHS) (n=163). Mean contra-lateral NSA was 130.2 degrees (112.9--148 degrees ) and 64 patients (58 female, 6 male) had a NSA <125 degrees . Mean adjusted TAD was 18.7 mm (5.8--43.8mm) and 88.9% of cases had a TAD of less than 25 mm. TAD values were significantly greater using an IMHS if NSA was <125 degrees than if NSA was >125 degrees (p=0.028). This was not the case with the CHS. The use of the 130 degrees -IMHS in patients with a NSA <125 degrees leads to poorer lag screw placement than if NSA >125 degrees and caution is advocated when using this device in such cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16214479     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  7 in total

Review 1.  The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Jan Bredow; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Hagen Andruszkow; Michael Frink; Cornelia Frömke; Amir Matityahu; Christian Zeckey; Philipp Mommsen; Stefanie Suntardjo; Christian Krettek; Frank Hildebrand
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Comparing two different automatic methods to measure femoral neck-shaft angle based on PointNet++ network.

Authors:  Zhe Li; Jiayu Yang; Xinghua Li; Kunzheng Wang; Jungang Han; Pei Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mitchell Ng; Nihar S Shah; Ivan Golub; Matthew Ciminero; Kevin Zhai; Kevin K Kang; Ahmed K Emara; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-10-19

5.  A review of tip apex distance in dynamic hip screw fixation of osteoporotic hip fractures.

Authors:  Imran Haruna Abdulkareem
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2012-10

6.  Is there a difference in the positioning of sliding screws between stable and unstable extracapsular fractures?

Authors:  Pedro José Labronici; Rodrigo Freitas da Silva; Ana Maria Santos Viana; Saulo Santos Blunck; José Sergio Franco; Sergio Ricardo Neto; Robinson Esteves Santos Pires; Roberto Canto
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-02-24

7.  How to get better TAD? Relationship between anteversion angle of nail and position of femoral neck guide pin during nailing of intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Yadong Liu; Shenglong Li; Xiuhui Wang; Changjian Liu; Xin Tang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.