Literature DB >> 35858999

Comparing two different automatic methods to measure femoral neck-shaft angle based on PointNet++ network.

Zhe Li1, Jiayu Yang2, Xinghua Li3, Kunzheng Wang1, Jungang Han4, Pei Yang5.   

Abstract

Accurate measurement of the femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA) is of great significance for diagnosing hip joint diseases and preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty. However, the repeatability of manual measurements is not as satisfactory, and the difference between 2D and 3D measurements is not clear. The computer-aided method provides a platform for automatic and accurate measurement of the NSA. The femoral point cloud datasets from 310 subjects were segmented into three regions, including the femoral head, femoral neck, and femoral shaft using PointNet++. We created a projection plane to simulate the hip anteroposterior radiograph and fitted the femoral neck axis and femoral shaft axis to complete the 2D measurement, while we directly fitted the two axes in space to complete the 3D measurement. Also, we conducted the manual measurement of the NSA. We verified the accuracy of the segmentation and compared the results of the two automatic and manual methods. The Dice coefficient of femoral segmentation reached 0.9746, and MIoU of that was 0.9165. No significant difference was found between any two of the three methods. While comparing the 2D and 3D methods, the average accuracy was 98.00%, and the average error was 2.58°. This paper proposed two accurate and automatic methods to measure the NSA based on a 2D plane and a 3D model respectively. Although the femoral neck and femoral shaft axes did not intersect in 3D space, the NSAs obtained by 2D and 3D methods were basically consistent.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35858999      PMCID: PMC9300576          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16695-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  20 in total

1.  Towards automatic measurement of anteversion and neck-shaft angles in human femurs using CT images.

Authors:  Mariano E Casciaro; Damian Craiem
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Optimal randomized RANSAC.

Authors:  Ondrej Chum; Jirí Matas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.226

3.  Predicting the optimal entry point for femoral antegrade nailing using a new measurement approach.

Authors:  Jing-xin Zhao; Xiu-yun Su; Zhe Zhao; Li-cheng Zhang; Zhi Mao; Hao Zhang; Li-hai Zhang; Pei-fu Tang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Femoral neck shaft angle width is associated with hip-fracture risk in males but not independently of femoral neck bone density.

Authors:  C Ripamonti; L Lisi; M Avella
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Functional and anatomic orientation of the femoral head.

Authors:  David Wright; Cari Whyne; Michael Hardisty; Hans J Kreder; Omri Lubovsky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The reliability of radiographic assessment of femoral neck-shaft and implant angulation in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Olsen; Edward T Davis; Price A M Gallie; James P Waddell; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Assessment of risk of femoral neck fracture with radiographic texture parameters: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jérôme Thevenot; Jukka Hirvasniemi; Pasi Pulkkinen; Mikko Määttä; Raija Korpelainen; Simo Saarakkala; Timo Jämsä
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study.

Authors:  Am Fearon; S Stephens; Jl Cook; Pn Smith; T Neeman; W Cormick; Jm Scarvell
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  The neck-shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors.

Authors:  Cornelius S Fischer; Jens-Peter Kühn; Henry Völzke; Till Ittermann; Denis Gümbel; Richard Kasch; Lyubomir Haralambiev; René Laqua; Peter Hinz; Jörn Lange
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Determination of Femoral Neck Angle and Torsion Angle Utilizing a Novel Three-Dimensional Modeling and Analytical Technology Based on CT Datasets.

Authors:  Maximilian J Hartel; Andreas Petersik; Anne Schmidt; Daniel Kendoff; Jakob Nüchtern; Johannes M Rueger; Wolfgang Lehmann; Lars G Grossterlinden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.