Literature DB >> 16214388

Neurodisruption of selective attention: insights and implications.

Christopher D Chambers1, Jason B Mattingley.   

Abstract

Mechanisms of selective attention are vital for coherent perception and action. Recent advances in cognitive neuroscience have yielded key insights into the relationship between neural mechanisms of attention and eye movements, and the role of frontal and parietal brain regions as sources of attentional control. Here we explore the growing contribution of reversible neurodisruption techniques, including transcranial magnetic stimulation and microelectrode stimulation, to the cognitive neuroscience of spatial attention. These approaches permit unique causal inferences concerning the relationship between neural processes and behaviour, and have revealed fundamental mechanisms of attention in the human and animal brain. We conclude by suggesting that further advances in the neuroscience of attention will be facilitated by the combination of neurodisruption techniques with established neuroimaging methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16214388     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  21 in total

1.  Linear increases in BOLD response associated with increasing proportion of incongruent trials across time in a colour Stroop task.

Authors:  Rachel L C Mitchell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Attention governs action in the primate frontal eye field.

Authors:  Robert J Schafer; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Primate reaching cued by multichannel spatiotemporal cortical microstimulation.

Authors:  N A Fitzsimmons; W Drake; T L Hanson; M A Lebedev; M A L Nicolelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Searching for the role of the frontal eye fields in the visual attention network.

Authors:  Joseph L Brooks; Alexandra List
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Only some spatial patterns of fMRI response are read out in task performance.

Authors:  Mark A Williams; Sabin Dang; Nancy G Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Perturbation of visuospatial attention by high-frequency offline rTMS.

Authors:  Yu Jin; Claus C Hilgetag
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Network-targeted cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation improves attentional control.

Authors:  Michael Esterman; Michelle Thai; Hidefusa Okabe; Joseph DeGutis; Elyana Saad; Simon E Laganiere; Mark A Halko
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Contributions of human parietal and frontal cortices to attentional control during conflict resolution: a 1-Hz offline rTMS study.

Authors:  Yu Jin; Bettina Olk; Claus C Hilgetag
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Disentangling working memory processes during spatial span assessment: a modeling analysis of preferred eye movement strategies.

Authors:  Virginie M Patt; Michael L Thomas; Arpi Minassian; Mark A Geyer; Gregory G Brown; William Perry
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.475

10.  The essence of conscious conflict: subjective effects of sustaining incompatible intentions.

Authors:  Ezequiel Morsella; Jeremy R Gray; Stephen C Krieger; John A Bargh
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2009-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.