Literature DB >> 18563400

Perturbation of visuospatial attention by high-frequency offline rTMS.

Yu Jin1, Claus C Hilgetag.   

Abstract

The contribution of different cortical regions to visuospatial attention can be probed with the help of perturbation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Repetitive TMS (rTMS) has also been suggested as a tool for the therapy of brain injuries, by adjusting the neural excitability of injured or intact brain regions. Low- and high-frequency rTMS have been shown to result in subsequent (offline) reductions or increases of local cortical excitability, respectively. Previous studies demonstrated that low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS of posterior parietal cortex (PPC) produced significantly reduced detection of stimuli in the visual hemifield contralateral to the stimulation site, as well as increased ipsilateral detection. We here explored the functional impact of high-frequency (20 Hz) rTMS with an attention task similar to that of a previous low-frequency study (Hilgetag et al. in Nat Neurosci 4:953-957, 2001). Normal healthy subjects (N = 14) received high-frequency rTMS (20 Hz, 10 min, 50% stimulator output) over right or left PPC (coordinate points P4 or P3). After stimulation of the right PPC, detection of single visual stimuli in the contralateral hemifield was significantly impaired. Generally, rTMS of right and left PPC produced mirror-symmetric trends in reduced contralateral detection. These effects were still present after post-TMS sham stimulation (more than 20 min after the end of active rTMS). The results suggest that attentional function can be perturbed by high-frequency rTMS as well as by low-frequency rTMS, despite potential differences in the underlying neural mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18563400     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1449-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; M Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Contralateral neglect induced by right posterior parietal rTMS in healthy subjects.

Authors:  B Fierro; F Brighina; M Oliveri; A Piazza; V La Bua; D Buffa; E Bisiach
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Attention and primary visual cortex.

Authors:  M I Posner; C D Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Decreased corticospinal excitability after subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS over lateral premotor cortex.

Authors:  W Gerschlager; H R Siebner; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-08-14       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere transiently reduces contralesional visuospatial hemineglect.

Authors:  M Oliveri; E Bisiach; F Brighina; A Piazza; V La Bua; D Buffa; B Fierro
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Neurodisruption of selective attention: insights and implications.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Michelle J Kincade; Chris Lewis; Abraham Z Snyder; Ayelet Sapir
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-23       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation?

Authors:  Michael C Ridding; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  A PET study of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  M Corbetta; F M Miezin; G L Shulman; S E Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans.

Authors:  F Brighina; E Bisiach; M Oliveri; A Piazza; V La Bua; O Daniele; B Fierro
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Is neuroenhancement by noninvasive brain stimulation a net zero-sum proposition?

Authors:  Anna-Katharine Brem; Peter J Fried; Jared C Horvath; Edwin M Robertson; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Contributions of human parietal and frontal cortices to attentional control during conflict resolution: a 1-Hz offline rTMS study.

Authors:  Yu Jin; Bettina Olk; Claus C Hilgetag
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Novel 'hunting' method using transcranial magnetic stimulation over parietal cortex disrupts visuospatial sensitivity in relation to motor thresholds.

Authors:  R Oliver; O Bjoertomt; J Driver; R Greenwood; J Rothwell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The Downsides of Cognitive Enhancement.

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Bernhard Hommel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 7.519

5.  The effect of 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of posterior parietal cortex on visual attention.

Authors:  Isabel Dombrowe; Georgiana Juravle; Mohsen Alavash; Carsten Gießing; Claus C Hilgetag
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Selective perturbation of cognitive conflict in the human brain-A combined fMRI and rTMS study.

Authors:  Claudia Peschke; Raphael Köster; Margarethe Korsch; Sascha Frühholz; Christiane M Thiel; Manfred Herrmann; Claus C Hilgetag
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Low frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of right posterior parietal cortex reduces reaction time to perithreshold low spatial frequency visual stimuli.

Authors:  Seth Elkin-Frankston; Richard J Rushmore; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.