Literature DB >> 16213077

Parents' experiences of sharing neonatal information and decisions: consent, cost and risk.

Priscilla Alderson1, Joanna Hawthorne, Margaret Killen.   

Abstract

This paper is about the care of babies with confirmed or potential neurological problems in neonatal intensive care units. Drawing on recent ethnographic research, the paper considers parents' experiences of sharing information and decisions with neonatal staff, and approaches that support or restrict parents' involvement. There are growing medico-legal pressures on practitioners to inform parents and involve them in their babies' care. Data are drawn from observations in four neonatal units in southern England, and interviews with the parents of 80 babies and with 40 senior staff. The paper compares standards set by recent guidance, with parents' views about their share in decision-making, their first meetings with their babies, 'minor' decision-making, the different neonatal units, being a helpless observer and missed opportunities. Parents' standards for informed decisions are summarised, with their reported views about two-way decision-making, and their practical need to know. Whereas doctors emphasise distancing aspects of the consent process, parents tend to value 'drawing together' aspects.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16213077     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  17 in total

1.  Communicating with parents of high-risk infants in neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  Wendy Yee; Sue Ross
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Parental Moral Distress and Moral Schism in the Neonatal ICU.

Authors:  Gabriella Foe; Jonathan Hellmann; Rebecca A Greenberg
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  The acceptability among lay persons and health professionals of actively ending the lives of damaged newborns.

Authors:  Nathalie Teisseyre; Charles Vanraet; Paul C Sorum; Etienne Mullet
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2010-09

4.  Family-Centered Care of the Surgical Neonate.

Authors:  Sheila M Gephart; Jacqueline M McGrath
Journal:  Newborn Infant Nurs Rev       Date:  2012-02-16

5.  From powerlessness to empowerment: Mothers expect more than information from the prenatal consultation for preterm labour.

Authors:  Nathalie Gaucher; Antoine Payot
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Strengths and weaknesses of parent-staff communication in the NICU: a survey assessment.

Authors:  Helena Wigert; Michaela Blom Dellenmark; Kristina Bry
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  What information do parents need when facing end-of-life decisions for their child? A meta-synthesis of parental feedback.

Authors:  Vicki Xafis; Dominic Wilkinson; Jane Sullivan
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  The experience of premature birth for fathers: the application of the Clinical Interview for Parents of High-Risk Infants (CLIP) to an Italian sample.

Authors:  Carla Candelori; Carmen Trumello; Alessandra Babore; Miri Keren; Roberta Romanelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-29

Review 9.  A meta-ethnography and theory of parental ethical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sara A Rosenthal; Marie T Nolan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2013-06-17

Review 10.  Factors influencing the care provided for periviable babies in Australia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Susan Ireland; Robin Ray; Sarah Larkins; Lynn Woodward
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.