Literature DB >> 16212608

ELF4 is a phytochrome-regulated component of a negative-feedback loop involving the central oscillator components CCA1 and LHY.

Elise A Kikis1, Rajnish Khanna, Peter H Quail.   

Abstract

Evidence has been presented that a negative transcriptional feedback loop formed by the genes CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED (CCA1), LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) and TIMING OF CAB (TOC1) constitutes the core of the central oscillator of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Here we show that these genes are expressed at constant, basal levels in dark-grown seedlings. Transfer to constant red light (Rc) rapidly induces a biphasic pattern of CCA1 and LHY expression, and a reciprocal TOC1 expression pattern over the first 24 h, consistent with initial induction of this synchronous oscillation by the light signal. We have used this assay with wild-type and mutant seedlings to examine the role of these oscillator components, and to determine the function of ELF3 and ELF4 in their light-regulated expression. The data show that whereas TOC1 is necessary for light-induced CCA1/LHY expression, the combined absence of CCA1 and LHY has little effect on the pattern of light-induced TOC1 expression, indicating that the negative regulatory arm of the proposed oscillator is not fully functional during initial seedling de-etiolation. By contrast, ELF4 is necessary for light-induced expression of both CCA1 and LHY, and conversely, CCA1 and LHY act negatively on light-induced ELF4 expression. Together with the observation that the temporal light-induced expression profile of ELF4 is counter-phased to that of CCA1 and LHY and parallels that of TOC1, these data are consistent with a previously unrecognized negative-feedback loop formed by CCA1/LHY and ELF4 in a manner analogous to the proposed CCA1/LHY/TOC1 oscillator. ELF3 is also necessary for light-induced CCA1/LHY expression, but it is neither light-induced nor clock-regulated during de-etiolation. Taken together, the data suggest (a) that ELF3, ELF4, and TOC1 all function in the primary, phytochrome-mediated light-input pathway to the circadian oscillator in Arabidopsis; and (b) that this oscillator consists of two or more interlocking transcriptional feedback loops that may be differentially operative during initial light induction and under steady-state circadian conditions in entrained green plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16212608     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02531.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant J        ISSN: 0960-7412            Impact factor:   6.417


  91 in total

Review 1.  How plants tell the time.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Katharine E Hubbard; Carlos T Hotta; Antony N Dodd; Alex A R Webb
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Coordinated transcriptional regulation underlying the circadian clock in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Gang Li; Hamad Siddiqui; Yibo Teng; Rongcheng Lin; Xiang-yuan Wan; Jigang Li; On-Sun Lau; Xinhao Ouyang; Mingqiu Dai; Jianmin Wan; Paul F Devlin; Xing Wang Deng; Haiyang Wang
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Conservation, convergence, and divergence of light-responsive, circadian-regulated, and tissue-specific expression patterns during evolution of the Arabidopsis GATA gene family.

Authors:  Iain W Manfield; Paul F Devlin; Chih-Hung Jen; David R Westhead; Philip M Gilmartin
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  The role of the Arabidopsis morning loop components CCA1, LHY, PRR7, and PRR9 in temperature compensation.

Authors:  Patrice A Salomé; Detlef Weigel; C Robertson McClung
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 5.  Circadian redox signaling in plant immunity and abiotic stress.

Authors:  Steven H Spoel; Gerben van Ooijen
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 8.401

6.  Circadian Stress Regimes Affect the Circadian Clock and Cause Jasmonic Acid-Dependent Cell Death in Cytokinin-Deficient Arabidopsis Plants.

Authors:  Silvia Nitschke; Anne Cortleven; Tim Iven; Ivo Feussner; Michel Havaux; Michael Riefler; Thomas Schmülling
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 7.  Dancing in the dark: darkness as a signal in plants.

Authors:  Adam Seluzicki; Yogev Burko; Joanne Chory
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 7.228

8.  A Constitutively Active Allele of Phytochrome B Maintains Circadian Robustness in the Absence of Light.

Authors:  Matthew Alan Jones; Wei Hu; Suzanne Litthauer; J Clark Lagarias; Stacey Lynn Harmer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Distinct light and clock modulation of cytosolic free Ca2+ oscillations and rhythmic CHLOROPHYLL A/B BINDING PROTEIN2 promoter activity in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Xiaodong Xu; Carlos T Hotta; Antony N Dodd; John Love; Robert Sharrock; Young Wha Lee; Qiguang Xie; Carl H Johnson; Alex A R Webb
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  COP1 SUPPRESSOR 4 promotes seedling photomorphogenesis by repressing CCA1 and PIF4 expression in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Xianhai Zhao; Yan Jiang; Jian Li; Enamul Huq; Z Jeffrey Chen; Dongqing Xu; Xing Wang Deng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.