Literature DB >> 16211401

Plagiocephalometry: a non-invasive method to quantify asymmetry of the skull; a reliability study.

Leo A van Vlimmeren1, Tim Takken, Léon N A van Adrichem, Yolanda van der Graaf, Paul J M Helders, Raoul H H Engelbert.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Deformational plagiocephaly (DP) in newborns and very young children is a common problem in daily practice. The intrarater and interrater reliability of plagiocephalometry (PCM), a new, non-invasive, inexpensive instrument to assess and quantify the asymmetry of the skull, is evaluated at the outpatient Department of Physical Therapy of the Bernhoven Hospital at Veghel, The Netherlands. Using a thermoplastic material to mould the outline of the infant's skull, a reproduction of the skull shape is performed on paper, allowing for accurate cephalometric measurements. Fifty children (aged 0-24 months), with or without positional preference of the head, and with or without DP, were measured three times by two separate, experienced pediatric physical therapists. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) regarding the measurements of the drawn lines were all above 0.92 (intrarater reliability) and 0.90 (interrater reliability). The ICCs of the plagiocephaly indicators ear deviation (ED), antero-sinistra-antero-dextra (ASAD), postero-dextra-postero-sinistra (PDPS) and oblique diameter difference (ODD) were 0.88, 0.57, 0.92 and 0.96, respectively, for the intrarater reliability and 0.90, 0.65, 0.94 and 0.96, respectively, for the interrater reliability. The ICCs of the two indices oblique diameter difference index (ODDI) and cranial proportional index (CPI) were 0.97 and 0.96, respectively, for the intrarater reliability and 0.95 and 0.92, respectively, for the interrater reliability. The limits of agreement according to Bland Altman, comprising 95% of the differences between two measurements (2 sd), were 4.3 mm (ED), 5.9 mm (ASAD), 3.0 mm (PDPS), 3.4 mm (ODD), 2.7% (ODDI) and 4.5% (CPI) for the intrarater reliability, and 3.7 mm (ED), 5.2 mm (ASAD), 2.4 mm (PDPS), 3.3 mm (ODD), 2.9% (ODDI) and 5.8% (CPI) for the interrater reliability.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that PCM is an easy-to-apply, non-invasive and reliable measurement instrument to assess skull asymmetry with good clinical accuracy and low application costs. PCM might serve as an instrument to be used in all levels of care for children with DP, and might provide information concerning the natural course of DP, as well as the assessment of the effects of conservative treatment strategies on DP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16211401     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-005-0011-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  46 in total

1.  Helmet versus nonhelmet treatment in nonsynostotic positional posterior plagiocephaly.

Authors:  J S Vles; C Colla; J W Weber; E Beuls; J Wilmink; H Kingma
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Observations on a recent increase in plagiocephaly without synostosis.

Authors:  A A Kane; L E Mitchell; K P Craven; J L Marsh
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Treatment of craniofacial asymmetry with dynamic orthotic cranioplasty.

Authors:  T R Littlefield; S P Beals; K H Manwaring; J K Pomatto; E F Joganic; K A Golden; C E Ripley
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Frontal plagiocephaly: synostotic, compensational, or deformational.

Authors:  R J Bruneteau; J B Mulliken
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Computer-aided measurement and grading of cranial asymmetry in children with and without torticollis.

Authors:  P Y Chang; Y W Chien; F Y Huang; N C Chang; D B Perng
Journal:  Clin Orthod Res       Date:  2001-11

7.  An assistive device for the treatment of positional plagiocephaly.

Authors:  B S Carson; D Muñoz; G Gross; C A VanderKolk; C S James; J Gates; M North; M McKnight; M Guarnieri
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Management of deformational plagiocephaly: repositioning versus orthotic therapy.

Authors:  John M Graham; Mayela Gomez; Andy Halberg; Dawn L Earl; Jeannie T Kreutzman; Jinrui Cui; Xiuqing Guo
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Active counterpositioning or orthotic device to treat positional plagiocephaly?

Authors:  B P Loveday; T B de Chalain
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  Analysis of posterior plagiocephaly: deformational versus synostotic.

Authors:  J B Mulliken; D L Vander Woude; M Hansen; R A LaBrie; R M Scott
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  17 in total

1.  Use physical therapy to head off this deformity in infants. Consider early PT to prevent severe deformational plagiocephaly.

Authors:  Lisa Vargish; Michael D Mendoza; Bernard Ewigman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 2.  Positional plagiocephaly: what the pediatrician needs to know. A review.

Authors:  Laura Pogliani; Chiara Mameli; Valentina Fabiano; Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Clinical profile and evolution of infants with deformational plagiocephaly included in a conservative treatment program.

Authors:  I Cabrera-Martos; M C Valenza; A Benítez-Feliponi; C Robles-Vizcaíno; A Ruiz-Extremera; G Valenza-Demet
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  A new parameter for the management of positional plagiocephaly: the size of the anterior fontanelle matters.

Authors:  Danielle S Wendling-Keim; Y Macé; H Lochbihler; H-G Dietz; Markus Lehner
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Insufficient vitamin D supplement use during pregnancy and early childhood: a risk factor for positional skull deformation.

Authors:  Marieke G M Weernink; Renske M van Wijk; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Caren I Lanting; Cameron C Grant; Leo A van Vlimmeren; Magda M Boere-Boonekamp
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Methods to Diagnose, Classify, and Monitor Infantile Deformational Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Mette Hobaek Siegenthaler
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2015-11-11

7.  Validation of cephalic index measurements in scaphocephaly.

Authors:  Erik J van Lindert; Francoise J Siepel; Hans Delye; Anke M Ettema; Stefaan J Bergé; Thomas J J Maal; Wilfred A Borstlap
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  A new ultrasound method for assessment of head shape change in infants with plagiocephaly.

Authors:  Jin Kyung Kim; Dong Rak Kwon; Gi-Young Park
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2014-08-28

9.  Parents' decision for helmet therapy in infants with skull deformation.

Authors:  Renske M van Wijk; Janine A van Til; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Monique P L'Hoir; Magda M Boere-Boonekamp; Maarten J IJzerman
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  HElmet therapy Assessment in infants with Deformed Skulls (HEADS): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Renske M van Wijk; Magda M Boere-Boonekamp; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Leo A van Vlimmeren; Maarten J IJzerman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.