PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of a conservative intervention in infants with plagiocephaly according to their specific clinical profile. METHODS: Prospective clinical trial in which 104 infants with plagiocephaly accompanied or not by congenital or positional torticollis were referred to Early Care and Monitoring Unit (USAT) of San Cecilio Hospital in Granada, between 2009 and 2012. All the infants, grouped into three categories of severity, were included in the physiotherapy protocol until adequate craniofacial morphology and motor development were achieved. The study included an assessment of parents and infants. Parents were assessed with a questionnaire about the mother's medical history and birth-related issues. The assessment of infants included anthropometric measures, a positional assessment, the observation of the head, the assessment of severity, and motor development. RESULTS: Birth characteristics were similar in the total sample but showed different clinical profiles according to treatment aspects. More specifically, infants with severe plagiocephaly were referred to treatment later and spent more time in treatment; use of an orthotic helmet was also more prevalent in this category. There were also significant differences (P < 0.05) in the acquisition of specific gross motor skills depending on the severity of plagiocephaly. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the physiotherapy protocol presented is effective to correct plagiocephaly. Severity of plagiocephaly is a marker that should be taken into account when designing actions aimed at improving gross motor skill development.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of a conservative intervention in infants with plagiocephaly according to their specific clinical profile. METHODS: Prospective clinical trial in which 104 infants with plagiocephaly accompanied or not by congenital or positional torticollis were referred to Early Care and Monitoring Unit (USAT) of San Cecilio Hospital in Granada, between 2009 and 2012. All the infants, grouped into three categories of severity, were included in the physiotherapy protocol until adequate craniofacial morphology and motor development were achieved. The study included an assessment of parents and infants. Parents were assessed with a questionnaire about the mother's medical history and birth-related issues. The assessment of infants included anthropometric measures, a positional assessment, the observation of the head, the assessment of severity, and motor development. RESULTS: Birth characteristics were similar in the total sample but showed different clinical profiles according to treatment aspects. More specifically, infants with severe plagiocephaly were referred to treatment later and spent more time in treatment; use of an orthotic helmet was also more prevalent in this category. There were also significant differences (P < 0.05) in the acquisition of specific gross motor skills depending on the severity of plagiocephaly. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the physiotherapy protocol presented is effective to correct plagiocephaly. Severity of plagiocephaly is a marker that should be taken into account when designing actions aimed at improving gross motor skill development.
Authors: B Lynne Hutchison; Alistair W Stewart; Tristan de Chalain; Edwin A Mitchell Journal: J Paediatr Child Health Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 1.954
Authors: Brent R Collett; Elizabeth H Aylward; Jessica Berg; Candice Davidoff; Justin Norden; Michael L Cunningham; Matthew L Speltz Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2012-03-25 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Brent R Collett; Jacqueline R Starr; Deborah Kartin; Carrie L Heike; Jessica Berg; Michael L Cunningham; Matthew L Speltz Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2011-07
Authors: Jacqueline Nuysink; Ingrid C van Haastert; Maria J C Eijsermans; Corine Koopman-Esseboom; Janjaap van der Net; Linda S de Vries; Paul J M Helders Journal: Early Hum Dev Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 2.079
Authors: Leo A van Vlimmeren; Tim Takken; Léon N A van Adrichem; Yolanda van der Graaf; Paul J M Helders; Raoul H H Engelbert Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2005-10-07 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Leo A van Vlimmeren; Yolanda van der Graaf; Magda M Boere-Boonekamp; Monique P L'Hoir; Paul J M Helders; Raoul H H Engelbert Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2008-08
Authors: I Cabrera-Martos; M C Valenza; G Valenza-Demet; A Benítez-Feliponi; C Robles-Vizcaíno; A Ruiz-Extremera Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Renske M van Wijk; Leo A van Vlimmeren; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Catharina P B Van der Ploeg; Maarten J Ijzerman; Magda M Boere-Boonekamp Journal: BMJ Date: 2014-05-01
Authors: Leo A van Vlimmeren; Raoul Hh Engelbert; Maaike Pelsma; Hans Mm Groenewoud; Magda M Boere-Boonekamp; Maria Wg Nijhuis-van der Sanden Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Josefa González-Santos; Jerónimo J González-Bernal; Raquel De-la-Fuente Anuncibay; Raúl Soto-Cámara; Esther Cubo; José M Aguilar-Parra; Rubén Trigueros; Remedios López-Liria Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 3.390