Literature DB >> 16210007

Microsuction of blastocoelic fluid before vitrification increased survival and pregnancy of mouse expanded blastocysts, but pretreatment with the cytoskeletal stabilizer did not increase blastocyst survival.

Shee-Uan Chen1, Tsung-Hsien Lee, Yih-Ron Lien, Yi-Yi Tsai, Li-Jung Chang, Yu-Shih Yang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain effects of thermal change, size of blastocoele, artificial shrinkage, and cytoskeletal stabilizer on survival of blastocysts from vitrification.
DESIGN: In vitro and in vivo study.
SETTING: University infertility clinic and academic research laboratory. ANIMAL(S): Female mice of outbred ICR strain, aged 6 to 8 weeks. INTERVENTION(S): In experiment 1, various stages of mouse blastocysts were vitrified by using conventional straws or closed pulled straws (CPS). In experiment 2, microsuction was performed of blastocoelic fluid for blastocysts and expanded blastocysts before vitrification. In experiment 3, cytochalasin B (CCB) was used to treat embryos during vitrification. In experiment 4, vitrified expanded blastocysts were transferred to pseudopregnant mice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Survival and pregnancy. RESULT(S): The survival rates of early blastocysts were high and not different between the conventional straws and the CPS. The survival rates decreased for blastocysts and expanded blastocysts in both of the two methods. But the use of CPS achieved higher survival rates for blastocysts (83% vs. 70%) and expanded blastocysts (60% vs. 39%) than did the conventional straws. Microsuction before vitrification increased the survival rates for blastocysts (92% vs. 80%) and expanded blastocysts (89% vs. 59%). Survival of vitrified embryos was not distinct between CCB treatment and non-CCB treatment. The percentage of live young from vitrified expanded blastocysts using microsuction was greater than that from vitrified expanded blastocysts without microsuction (34% vs. 9%). CONCLUSION(S): The size of the blastocoeles influenced survival of blastocysts from vitrification. A rapid thermal change of CPS and effective reduction of blastocoelic fluid by microsuction may facilitate vitrification and reduce ice crystal damage for blastocysts and expanded blastocysts. The microfilament inhibitor of CCB treatment did not increase their survival rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16210007     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

1.  Retrospective clinical analysis of two artificial shrinkage methods applied prior to blastocyst vitrification on the outcome of frozen embryo transfer.

Authors:  Shanren Cao; Chun Zhao; Junqiang Zhang; Xun Wu; Xirong Guo; Xiufeng Ling
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Comparison of vitrified outcomes between human early blastocysts and expanded blastocysts.

Authors:  Wen-Yan Song; Xue-Gai Wang; Hai-Xia Jin; Gui-Dong Yao; Xiang-Yang Zhang; Sen-Lin Shi; Hong-Yi Yang; Zhao-Feng Peng; Ying-Pu Sun
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.416

3.  Vitrification of human early cavitating and deflated expanded blastocysts: clinical outcome of 474 cycles.

Authors:  G A Rama Raju; G Jaya Prakash; K Murali Krishna; K Madan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Artificial shrinkage of blastocoel using a laser pulse prior to vitrification improves clinical outcome.

Authors:  Ehab Darwish; Yasmin Magdi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Vitrification in open and closed carriers at different cell stages: assessment of embryo survival, development, DNA integrity and stability during vapor phase storage for transport.

Authors:  Faten AbdelHafez; Jing Xu; Jeffrey Goldberg; Nina Desai
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.563

6.  Effect of artificial shrinkage on clinical outcome in fresh blastocyst transfer cycles.

Authors:  Yong Soo Hur; Jeong Hyun Park; Eun Kyung Ryu; Hae Jin Yoon; San Hyun Yoon; Chang Young Hur; Won Don Lee; Jin Ho Lim
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2011-06-30

7.  Characterization and quantification of proteins secreted by single human embryos prior to implantation.

Authors:  Maurizio Poli; Alessandro Ori; Tim Child; Souraya Jaroudi; Katharina Spath; Martin Beck; Dagan Wells
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 12.137

Review 8.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Where We Are Today.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Katarzyna Litwicka; Maria Giulia Minasi; Elisabetta Cursio; Pier Francesco Greco; Paolo Barillari
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Effect on clinical and neonatal outcomes of blastocelic microsuction prior to vitrification.

Authors:  Shingo Mitsuhata; Yuji Endo; Momoko Hayashi; Yoshitaka Fujii; Hiroaki Motoyama
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-11

Review 10.  Factors affecting the outcome of human blastocyst vitrification.

Authors:  Amr A Kader; Audrey Choi; Yasser Orief; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.