OBJECTIVE: Spatial localization of neural activity from within the brain with electrocorticography (ECoG) and electroencephalography remains a challenge in clinical and research settings, and while microfabricated ECoG (micro-ECoG) array technology continues to improve, complementary methods to simultaneously modulate cortical activity while recording are needed. APPROACH: We developed a neural interface utilizing optogenetics, cranial windowing, and micro-ECoG arrays fabricated on a transparent polymer. This approach enabled us to directly modulate neural activity at known locations around micro-ECoG arrays in mice expressing Channelrhodopsin-2. We applied photostimuli varying in time, space and frequency to the cortical surface, and we targeted multiple depths within the cortex using an optical fiber while recording micro-ECoG signals. MAIN RESULTS: Negative potentials of up to 1.5 mV were evoked by photostimuli applied to the entire cortical window, while focally applied photostimuli evoked spatially localized micro-ECoG potentials. Two simultaneously applied focal stimuli could be separated, depending on the distance between them. Photostimuli applied within the cortex with an optical fiber evoked more complex micro-ECoG potentials with multiple positive and negative peaks whose relative amplitudes depended on the depth of the fiber. SIGNIFICANCE: Optogenetic ECoG has potential applications in the study of epilepsy, cortical dynamics, and neuroprostheses.
OBJECTIVE: Spatial localization of neural activity from within the brain with electrocorticography (ECoG) and electroencephalography remains a challenge in clinical and research settings, and while microfabricated ECoG (micro-ECoG) array technology continues to improve, complementary methods to simultaneously modulate cortical activity while recording are needed. APPROACH: We developed a neural interface utilizing optogenetics, cranial windowing, and micro-ECoG arrays fabricated on a transparent polymer. This approach enabled us to directly modulate neural activity at known locations around micro-ECoG arrays in mice expressing Channelrhodopsin-2. We applied photostimuli varying in time, space and frequency to the cortical surface, and we targeted multiple depths within the cortex using an optical fiber while recording micro-ECoG signals. MAIN RESULTS: Negative potentials of up to 1.5 mV were evoked by photostimuli applied to the entire cortical window, while focally applied photostimuli evoked spatially localized micro-ECoG potentials. Two simultaneously applied focal stimuli could be separated, depending on the distance between them. Photostimuli applied within the cortex with an optical fiber evoked more complex micro-ECoG potentials with multiple positive and negative peaks whose relative amplitudes depended on the depth of the fiber. SIGNIFICANCE: Optogenetic ECoG has potential applications in the study of epilepsy, cortical dynamics, and neuroprostheses.
Authors: Joshua T Trachtenberg; Brian E Chen; Graham W Knott; Guoping Feng; Joshua R Sanes; Egbert Welker; Karel Svoboda Journal: Nature Date: 2002 Dec 19-26 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Amelia A Schendel; Sanitta Thongpang; Sarah K Brodnick; Thomas J Richner; Bradley D B Lindevig; Lisa Krugner-Higby; Justin C Williams Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Thomas J Richner; Ryan Baumgartner; Sarah K Brodnick; Mehdi Azimipour; Lisa A Krugner-Higby; Kevin W Eliceiri; Justin C Williams; Ramin Pashaie Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Dong-Wook Park; Sarah K Brodnick; Jared P Ness; Farid Atry; Lisa Krugner-Higby; Amelia Sandberg; Solomon Mikael; Thomas J Richner; Joseph Novello; Hyungsoo Kim; Dong-Hyun Baek; Jihye Bong; Seth T Frye; Sanitta Thongpang; Kyle I Swanson; Wendell Lake; Ramin Pashaie; Justin C Williams; Zhenqiang Ma Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: P Ledochowitsch; A Yazdan-Shahmorad; K E Bouchard; C Diaz-Botia; T L Hanson; J-W He; B A Seybold; E Olivero; E A K Phillips; T J Blanche; C E Schreiner; A Hasenstaub; E F Chang; P N Sabes; M M Maharbiz Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Michele Insanally; Michael Trumpis; Charles Wang; Chia-Han Chiang; Virginia Woods; Kay Palopoli-Trojani; Silvia Bossi; Robert C Froemke; Jonathan Viventi Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Amelia A Schendel; Michael W Nonte; Corinne Vokoun; Thomas J Richner; Sarah K Brodnick; Farid Atry; Seth Frye; Paige Bostrom; Ramin Pashaie; Sanitta Thongpang; Kevin W Eliceiri; Justin C Williams Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 5.379