Literature DB >> 16208704

Race modifies the association between breast carcinoma pathologic prognostic indicators and the positive status for HER-2/neu.

Azadeh T Stark1, Sarah Claud, Alissa Kapke, Mei Lu, Michael Linden, Jennifer Griggs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inferences about the variations in the biology of breast carcinoma between African-Americans and Caucasians have been reported. The difference in the prevalence of positive HER-2/neu breast carcinoma was evaluated and the race-specific risk was assessed for positive HER-2/neu among a cohort of women diagnosed with their first primary breast carcinoma, given the accepted prognostic pathologic indicators for positive HER-2/neu status.
METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and pathologic data were collected from existing databases. The status of HER-2/neu was considered positive if the immunohistochemistry score was 3+ or if the fluorescent in situ hybridization indicated a ratio greater than 2. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the race-specific risk for HER-2/neu positive breast carcinoma.
RESULTS: The difference in the prevalence of HER-2/neu-positive status between African-American and Caucasian women was not statistically significant (P = 0.46). For Caucasian women the likelihood for positive HER-2/neu was statistically significant and increased almost linearly within each stage with nuclear grade dedifferentiation relative to the reference group, women with Stage 1, Grade 1 carcinomas. For African-American women, this risk was not significantly associated with stage, nuclear grade, their interaction term, or other pathologic prognostic indicators.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that race modifies the association between the pathologic prognostic indicators of breast carcinoma and the likelihood of HER-2/neu-positive carcinoma. So far, clinical correlative studies of HER-2/neu have not included race as an independent variable. Concerns about the limited generalizability and the need for validation of the findings across racial lines have been expressed previously. Copyright 2005 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16208704     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

1.  Prevalence and prognostic role of triple-negative breast cancer by race: a surveillance study.

Authors:  Helen Swede; David I Gregorio; Susan H Tannenbaum; Jessica A Brockmeyer; Christine Ambrosone; Lori L Wilson; Mellisa A Pensa; Lou Gonsalves; Richard G Stevens; Carolyn D Runowicz
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  African ancestry and higher prevalence of triple-negative breast cancer: findings from an international study.

Authors:  Azadeh Stark; Celina G Kleer; Iman Martin; Baffour Awuah; Anthony Nsiah-Asare; Valerie Takyi; Maria Braman; Solomon E Quayson; Richard Zarbo; Max Wicha; Lisa Newman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Population-based estimate of the prevalence of HER-2 positive breast cancer tumors for early stage patients in the US.

Authors:  Kathleen A Cronin; Linda C Harlan; Kevin W Dodd; Jeffrey S Abrams; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Clinicopathological factors associated to HER-2 status in a hospital-based sample of breast cancer patients in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Ana P Ortiz; Orquídea Frías; Carmen González-Keelan; Erick Suárez; David Capó; Javier Pérez; Fernando Cabanillas; Edna Mora
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.705

5.  The contribution of cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis and survival to racial differences in years of life expectancy.

Authors:  Mitchell D Wong; Susan L Ettner; W John Boscardin; Martin F Shapiro
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  A profile of prognostic and molecular factors in European and Māori breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Gabi U Dachs; Maiko Kano; Ekaterina Volkova; Helen R Morrin; Valerie C L Davey; Gavin C Harris; Michelle Cheale; Christopher Frampton; Margaret J Currie; J Elisabeth Wells; Bridget A Robinson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-10       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Regional Variability in Percentage of Breast Cancers Reported as Positive for HER2 in California: Implications of Patient Demographics on Laboratory Benchmarks.

Authors:  Chieh-Yu Lin; Eugene E Carneal; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Scarlett L Gomez; Christina A Clarke; Kristin C Jensen; Allison W Kurian; Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.400

8.  A novel panel of serum miR-21/miR-155/miR-365 as a potential diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Guang Han; Yong-Dong Jiang; Chun-Hui Zhang; Yan-Mei Yang; Da Pang; Yan-Ni Song; Guo-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.859

9.  Influence of Preexisting Diabetes on Survival After a Breast Cancer Diagnosis in First Nations Women in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Amanda J Sheppard; Anna M Chiarelli; Anthony J G Hanley; Loraine D Marrett
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.