BACKGROUND: The study of breast cancer in women with African ancestry offers the promise of identifying markers for risk assessment and treatment of triple-negative disease. METHODS: African American and white American women with invasive cancer diagnosed at the Henry Ford Health System comprised the primary study population, and Ghanaian patients diagnosed and/or treated at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana constituted the comparison group. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens were transported to the University of Michigan for histopathology confirmation, and assessment of estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER-2/neu expression. RESULTS: The study population included 1008 white Americans, 581 African Americans, and 75 Ghanaians. Mean age at diagnosis was 48.0 years for Ghanaian, 60.8 years for African American, and 62.4 for white American cases (P=.002). Proportions of Ghanaian, African American, and white American cases with estrogen receptor-negative tumors were 76%, 36%, and 22%, respectively (P<.001), and proportions with triple-negative disease were 82%, 26%, and 16%, respectively (P<.001). All Ghanaian cases were palpable, locally advanced cancers; 57 (76%) were grade 3. A total of 147 American women were diagnosed as stage III or IV; of these, 67.5% (n=46) of African Americans and 44.6% (n=29) of white Americans were grade 3. Among palpable, grade 3 cancers, Ghanaians had the highest prevalence of triple-negative tumors (82.2%), followed by African Americans (32.8%) and white Americans (10.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates progressively increasing frequency of estrogen receptor-negative and triple-negative tumors among breast cancer patients with white American, African American, and Ghanaian/African backgrounds. This pattern indicates a need for additional investigations correlating the extent of African ancestry and high-risk breast cancer subtypes.
BACKGROUND: The study of breast cancer in women with African ancestry offers the promise of identifying markers for risk assessment and treatment of triple-negative disease. METHODS: African American and white American women with invasive cancer diagnosed at the Henry Ford Health System comprised the primary study population, and Ghanaian patients diagnosed and/or treated at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana constituted the comparison group. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens were transported to the University of Michigan for histopathology confirmation, and assessment of estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER-2/neu expression. RESULTS: The study population included 1008 white Americans, 581 African Americans, and 75 Ghanaians. Mean age at diagnosis was 48.0 years for Ghanaian, 60.8 years for African American, and 62.4 for white American cases (P=.002). Proportions of Ghanaian, African American, and white American cases with estrogen receptor-negative tumors were 76%, 36%, and 22%, respectively (P<.001), and proportions with triple-negative disease were 82%, 26%, and 16%, respectively (P<.001). All Ghanaian cases were palpable, locally advanced cancers; 57 (76%) were grade 3. A total of 147 American women were diagnosed as stage III or IV; of these, 67.5% (n=46) of African Americans and 44.6% (n=29) of white Americans were grade 3. Among palpable, grade 3 cancers, Ghanaians had the highest prevalence of triple-negative tumors (82.2%), followed by African Americans (32.8%) and white Americans (10.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates progressively increasing frequency of estrogen receptor-negative and triple-negative tumors among breast cancerpatients with white American, African American, and Ghanaian/African backgrounds. This pattern indicates a need for additional investigations correlating the extent of African ancestry and high-risk breast cancer subtypes.
Authors: Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Chad A Livasy; Lynn G Dressler; David Cowan; Kathleen Conway; Gamze Karaca; Melissa A Troester; Chiu Kit Tse; Sharon Edmiston; Sandra L Deming; Joseph Geradts; Maggie C U Cheang; Torsten O Nielsen; Patricia G Moorman; H Shelton Earp; Robert C Millikan Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-06-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Chad A Livasy; Gamze Karaca; Rita Nanda; Maria S Tretiakova; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Dominic T Moore; Charles M Perou Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Kenneth W Hance; William F Anderson; Susan S Devesa; Heather A Young; Paul H Levine Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2005-07-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: T Sørlie; C M Perou; R Tibshirani; T Aas; S Geisler; H Johnsen; T Hastie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; T Thorsen; H Quist; J C Matese; P O Brown; D Botstein; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-09-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Katie M O'Brien; Stephen R Cole; Lawrence S Engel; Jeannette T Bensen; Charles Poole; Amy H Herring; Robert C Millikan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Tess O'Meara; Anton Safonov; David Casadevall; Tao Qing; Andrea Silber; Brigid Killelea; Christos Hatzis; Lajos Pusztai Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Lisa M Hines; Betsy Risendal; Tim Byers; Sarah Mengshol; Jan Lowery; Meenakshi Singh Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Jyothi S Prabhu; Kanu Wahi; Aruna Korlimarla; Marjorrie Correa; Suraj Manjunath; N Raman; B S Srinath; T S Sridhar Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2012-02-24
Authors: Milan Radovich; Susan E Clare; Rutuja Atale; Ivanesa Pardo; Bradley A Hancock; Jeffrey P Solzak; Nawal Kassem; Theresa Mathieson; Anna Maria V Storniolo; Connie Rufenbarger; Heather A Lillemoe; Rachel J Blosser; Mi Ran Choi; Candice A Sauder; Diane Doxey; Jill E Henry; Eric E Hilligoss; Onur Sakarya; Fiona C Hyland; Matthew Hickenbotham; Jin Zhu; Jarret Glasscock; Sunil Badve; Mircea Ivan; Yunlong Liu; George W Sledge; Bryan P Schneider Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-11-29 Impact factor: 4.872