Literature DB >> 1287571

The perception of shrinking in apparent motion.

M Hershenson1.   

Abstract

Apparent motion was produced using two triangular patterns of different sizes, each exposed for 100 msec, with a 50-msec interstimulus interval and 200-msec recycle interval. The triangles were aligned either on center or on the midpoints of the bases. In Experiment 1, filled, outline, and three-dot triangles were viewed over four backgrounds: a blank illuminated field, and texture gradients constructed from horizontal lines, perspective lines, or a combination of these (full texture). In Experiment 2, outline and dot triangles were presented in one of three orientations: base down, base right, and base up over a blank background. Subjects made two forced-choice responses: apparent size was categorized as shrinking or not shrinking, and apparent motion was categorized as motion in depth or motion in a fixed frontal plane. The type of alignment was the major determiner of responses. When the midpoints of the base were aligned, the predominant response described a shrinking object in a fixed position in depth. When the centers were aligned, the predominant response described an object of constant size moving in depth.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1287571     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  7 in total

1.  PERCEPTION OF IMPENDING COLLISION: A STUDY OF VISUALLY DIRECTED AVOIDANT BEHAVIOR.

Authors:  W SCHIFF
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1965

2.  The kinetic depth effect.

Authors:  H WALLACH; D N O'CONNELL
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-04

Review 3.  Size-distance invariance: kinetic invariance is different from static invariance.

Authors:  M Hershenson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-06

4.  Size as a cue to distance; radial motion.

Authors:  W H ITTELSON
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1951-04

5.  Perceived size and motion in depth from optical expansion.

Authors:  M T Swanston; W C Gogel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-05

6.  The status of the minimum principle in the theoretical analysis of visual perception.

Authors:  G Hatfield; W Epstein
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Moon illusion and spiral aftereffect: illusions due to the loom-zoom system?

Authors:  M Hershenson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1982-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.