| Literature DB >> 30063811 |
Courtenay M Holscher1, Kyle Jackson1, Alvin G Thomas1, Christine E Haugen1, Sandra R DiBrito1, Karina Covarrubias1, Sommer E Gentry2, Matthew Ronin3, Amy D Waterman4,5, Allan B Massie1,6, Jacqueline Garonzik Wang1, Dorry L Segev1,6.
Abstract
One criticism of kidney paired donation (KPD) is that easy-to-match candidates leave the registry quickly, thus concentrating the pool with hard-to-match sensitized and blood type O candidates. We studied candidate/donor pairs who registered with the National Kidney Registry (NKR), the largest US KPD clearinghouse, from January 2012-June 2016. There were no changes in age, gender, BMI, race, ABO blood type, or panel-reactive antibody (PRA) of newly registering candidates over time, with consistent registration of hard-to-match candidates (59% type O and 38% PRA ≥97%). However, there was no accumulation of type O candidates over time, presumably due to increasing numbers of nondirected type O donors. Although there was an initial accumulation of candidates with PRA ≥97% (from 33% of the pool in 2012% to 43% in 2014, P = .03), the proportion decreased to 17% by June 2016 (P < .001). Some of this is explained by an increase in the proportion of candidates with PRA ≥97% who underwent a deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) after the implementation of the Kidney Allocation System (KAS), from 8% of 2012 registrants to 17% of 2015 registrants (P = .02). In this large KPD clearinghouse, increasing participation of nondirected donors and the KAS have lessened the accumulation of hard-to-match candidates, but highly sensitized candidates remain hard-to-match.Entities:
Keywords: donors and donation: living; donors and donation: paired exchange; health services and outcomes research; kidney transplantation/nephrology; kidney transplantation: living donor; sensitization
Year: 2018 PMID: 30063811 PMCID: PMC6287934 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086