Literature DB >> 1620337

The diagnostic reliability of magnetically evoked motor potentials in multiple sclerosis.

M Ravnborg1, R Liguori, P Christiansen, H Larsson, P S Sørensen.   

Abstract

In a prospective study, we evaluated the technique of magnetically evoked motor potentials (MEP) in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). We consecutively included 68 patients with symptoms or signs compatible with a demyelinative CNS affection. We subjected all patients to CSF analysis, MRI studies of the brain and brainstem, visual evoked potentials (VEP), brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP), and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP). We then used the results to categorize the patients according to the Poser criteria of multiple sclerosis. Blinded from the results of the above investigations, one of the authors made MEP recordings from three muscles in the upper limbs and two in the lower limbs in all 68 patients. Forty patients received an MS diagnosis, and in these, MRI was positive in 88%, MEP in 83%, VEP in 67%, SSEP in 63%, and BAEP in 42%. As to the diagnosis of MS, the reliability of a prolonged central motor conduction time (CMCT) was 0.83 (0.73 to 0.93), while the reliability of a normal CMCT was 0.75 (0.61 to 0.98). The information gained by MRI was best supplemented by VEP. Of the neurophysiologic tests, the MEP was in closest agreement with the MRI with a concordance of 85%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1620337     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.42.7.1296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  8 in total

1.  Conduction deficits of callosal fibres in early multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  K Schmierer; L Niehaus; S Röricht; B U Meyer
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Cortical excitability changes over time in progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Samar S Ayache; Alain Créange; Wassim H Farhat; Hela G Zouari; Catherine Lesage; Ulrich Palm; Mohammed Abdellaoui; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

3.  Multiple measures of corticospinal excitability are associated with clinical features of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J L Neva; B Lakhani; K E Brown; K P Wadden; C S Mang; N H M Ledwell; M R Borich; I M Vavasour; C Laule; A L Traboulsee; A L MacKay; L A Boyd
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Electrophysiological sequels of inflammatory demyelination.

Authors:  W A Nix
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Frequency doubling illusion VEPs and automated perimetry in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Rasa Ruseckaite; Teddy Maddess; Gytis Danta; Andrew Charles James
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Diagnostic value of paraclinical tests in multiple sclerosis: relative sensitivities and specificities for reclassification according to the Poser committee criteria.

Authors:  S Beer; K M Rösler; C W Hess
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Asymmetrical weakness associated with central nervous system involvement in a patient with guillain-barrè syndrome.

Authors:  Takao Kiriyama; Makito Hirano; Susumu Kusunoki; Daiji Morita; Minako Hirakawa; Yasuyo Tonomura; Takanori Kitauchi; Satoshi Ueno
Journal:  Clin Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-09-03

Review 8.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Potential Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review with Recommendations for Future Research.

Authors:  Nicholas J Snow; Katie P Wadden; Arthur R Chaves; Michelle Ploughman
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.599

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.