Literature DB >> 16906411

Frequency doubling illusion VEPs and automated perimetry in multiple sclerosis.

Rasa Ruseckaite1, Teddy Maddess, Gytis Danta, Andrew Charles James.   

Abstract

We examined frequency doubling (FD) illusion based automated perimetry (FDT) and dichoptic FD multifocal visual evoked potentials (FDmfVEPs) in Normal and multiple sclerosis (MS) subjects. Contrast thresholds were determined at 17 visual field locations using an FDT perimeter. The stimuli presented to each location were 0.25 cpd gratings presented with rapid (25 Hz) counterphase flicker and thus displayed the spatial FD illusion. Dichoptic mfVEPs were recorded by concurrently stimulating eight regions/eye with FD stimuli presented at 95% contrast. Recordings were obtained from 27 Normal subjects, 26 MS patients who had experienced Optic Neuritis (MSON) and 24 MS patients without a history of ON (MSNON). The FDT thresholds showed enhanced contrast sensitivity for MSON patients (P < 0.0001) but not for MSNON patients. Response amplitudes for the central four regions of the mfVEP stimulus were reduced in both patient groups (P < 0.005). A classification model based upon the FDT thresholds performed at a specificity of 96% for a sensitivity of 97% in MSON patients, but the accuracy (simultaneously largest sensitivities and specificities) was poor (approximately 60%) in MSNON patients. Discriminant models based on the FDT thresholds and FDmfVEPs were able to diagnose more that 90% MSON patients but performed poorly for MSNON patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16906411     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-006-9011-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  41 in total

1.  Apparent fineness of stationary compound gratings.

Authors:  T Maddess; J J Kulikowski
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Frequency doubling perimetry in resolved optic neuritis.

Authors:  N Fujimoto; E Adachi-Usami
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Andrew Charles James
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Contrast response of temporally sparse dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Ted Maddess; Andrew Charles James; Elizabeth Anne Bowman
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  [Evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: recent experience at the Locomotor System Diseases Hospital].

Authors:  J P Brasil-Neto
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.420

6.  Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields.

Authors:  A Heijl; A Lindgren; G Lindgren
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-08-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Long- and short-term variability of automated perimetry results in patients with optic neuritis and healthy subjects.

Authors:  M Wall; C A Johnson; K E Kutzko; R Nguyen; C Brito; J L Keltner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-01

8.  Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.

Authors:  Michael Wall; Richard K Neahring; Kimberly R Woodward
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Evidence of early cortical atrophy in MS: relevance to white matter changes and disability.

Authors:  N De Stefano; P M Matthews; M Filippi; F Agosta; M De Luca; M L Bartolozzi; L Guidi; A Ghezzi; E Montanari; A Cifelli; A Federico; S M Smith
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessing migraine patients with multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry.

Authors:  Eman N Ali; Corinne F Carle; Christian J Lueck; Maria Kolic; Ted Maddess
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.474

2.  Correlation of Central Versus Peripheral Macular Structure-Function With Acuity in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Faran Sabeti; Jo Lane; Emilie M F Rohan; Bhim B Rai; Rohan W Essex; Elinor McKone; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Comparing Objective Perimetry, Matrix Perimetry, and Regional Retinal Thickness in Mild Diabetic Macular Edema.

Authors:  Bhim B Rai; Ted Maddess; Corinne F Carle; Emilie M F Rohan; Josh P van Kleef; Richard C Barry; Rohan W Essex; Christopher J Nolan; Faran Sabeti
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.283

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.