Literature DB >> 1620240

The action of (+/-)L-660,863 [(+/-)3-(3-amino-1,2,4-oxadiazole-5-yl)-quinuclidine] at muscarinic receptor subtypes in vitro.

R M Eglen1, G C Harris, A P Ford, E H Wong, J R Pfister, R L Whiting.   

Abstract

1. The muscarinic pharmacology of a novel oxadiazole muscarinic agonist, (+/-) L-660,863, [+/-3-(3-amino-1,2,4-oxadiazole-5-yl)-quinuclidine] has been studied using pharmacological, radioligand binding and biochemical techniques, in vitro. 2. In isolated tissue experiments, (+/-)L-660,863 was a more potent agonist than carbachol in all preparations studied, being most potent at muscarinic receptors mediating negative chronotropy in guinea-pig right, spontaneously beating atria and least potent at receptors mediating contractions in canine saphenous vein and endothelial denuded rabbit aorta (-log EC50 values were 8.8, 6.6 and 6.3, respectively. The apparent affinities (-log KA) of (+/-)L-660,863) estimated by receptor inactivation, showed some selectivity toward the atrial M2 muscarinic receptor (-log KA = 7.6) in comparison to the M1 or M3 muscarinic receptors (-log KA = 5.4 and 6.2) respectively. This degree of selectivity was also observed in competition radioligand binding studies. 3. At M3 muscarinic receptors mediating inositol phosphates (IPs) accumulation in longitudinal muscle of guinea-pig ileum, the potency of (+/-)L-660,863 (-log EC50 value = 6.2) was similar to the apparent affinity calculated at M3 muscarinic receptors in the functional studies (see above). In contrast, at muscarinic receptors mediating IPs accumulation in guinea-pig atria and ventricles, the potency for (+/-)L-660,863 (-log EC50 = 6.2 and 6.4, respectively) was lower than the apparent affinity calculated at M2 muscarinic receptors from inotropic and binding studies in cardiac tissue (see above).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1620240     DOI: 10.1007/bf00176613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol        ISSN: 0028-1298            Impact factor:   3.000


  30 in total

1.  Estimation of apparent agonist affinity constants using desensitization of the ileal muscarinic receptor.

Authors:  R M Eglen; R L Whiting
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 2.  Muscarinic receptor subtypes: a critique of the current classification and a proposal for a working nomenclature.

Authors:  R M Eglen; R L Whiting
Journal:  J Auton Pharmacol       Date:  1986-12

3.  Muscarinic receptor sub-type in the rat anococcygeus muscle.

Authors:  M A Oriowo
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.765

4.  Pharmacological estimation of drug-receptor dissociation constants. Statistical evaluation. I. Agonists.

Authors:  R B Parker; D R Waud
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  In vivo characterisation of novel efficacious muscarinic receptor agonists.

Authors:  S B Freedman; E A Harley; R S Marwood; S Patel
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1990-10-09       Impact factor: 4.432

6.  The interaction of parafluorohexahydrosiladiphenidol at muscarinic receptors in vitro.

Authors:  R M Eglen; A D Michel; W W Montgomery; E A Kunysz; C A Machado; R L Whiting
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  A comparison of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors coupled to phosphatidylinositol turnover and to adenylate cyclase in guinea-pig atria and ventricles.

Authors:  E A Woodcock; E Leung; J K Mcleod
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1987-01-20       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Muscarinic receptors in rat sympathetic ganglia.

Authors:  D A Brown; S Fatherazi; J Garthwaite; R D White
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Evidence of paired M2 muscarinic receptors.

Authors:  L T Potter; L A Ballesteros; L H Bichajian; C A Ferrendelli; A Fisher; H E Hanchett; R Zhang
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.436

10.  Antagonist binding profiles of five cloned human muscarinic receptor subtypes.

Authors:  F Dörje; J Wess; G Lambrecht; R Tacke; E Mutschler; M R Brann
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Muscarinic receptors and drugs in cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  P A van Zwieten; H N Doods
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.727

2.  Effects of muscarinic M2 and M3 receptor stimulation and antagonism on responses to isoprenaline of guinea-pig trachea in vitro.

Authors:  N Watson; R M Eglen
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 8.739

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.