Literature DB >> 1994002

Antagonist binding profiles of five cloned human muscarinic receptor subtypes.

F Dörje1, J Wess, G Lambrecht, R Tacke, E Mutschler, M R Brann.   

Abstract

A variety of muscarinic antagonists are currently used as tools to pharmacologically subclassify muscarinic receptors into M1, M2 and M3 subtypes. In the present study, we have determined the affinity profiles of several of these antagonists at five cloned human muscarinic receptors (m1-m5) stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1). At all five receptors, the (R)-enantiomers of trihexyphenidyl and hexbutinol displayed considerably higher affinities (up to 525-fold) than their corresponding (S)-isomers. The stereoselectivity ratios [inhibition constant(S)/inhibition constant(R)] for both pairs of enantiomers were lowest at m2 receptors, suggesting that less stringent configurational demands are made by this receptor subtype. The "M1-selective" antagonist (R)-trihexyphenidyl displayed high affinities for m1 and m4 receptors. The "M2-selective" antagonists himbacine, (+-)-5,11-dihydro-11- ([(2-[(dipropylamino)methyl]-1- piperidinyl)ethyl)amino]carbonyl)-6H-pyrido(2,3-b)(1,4)benzodiazepine-6- one (AF-DX 384), 11-[4-[4-(diethylamino)butyl]-1-piperidinyl)acetyl)-5,11- dihydro-6H-pyrido(2,3-b) (1,4)benzodiazepine-6-one (AQ-RA 741) and (+)-(11-[2-[(diethylamino) methyl]-1-piperidinyl)acetyl)-5,11-di-hydro-6H-pyrido(2,3-b)(1,4) benzodiazepine-6-one [AF-DX 250; the (+)-enantiomer of AF-DX 116] exhibited high affinities for m2 and m4, intermediate affinities for m1 and m3 and low affinities for m5 receptors. This selectivity profile was most prominent for AQ-RA 741, which displayed 195- and 129-fold higher affinities for m2 and m4 receptors than for m5 receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1994002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  120 in total

1.  Comparative pharmacology of recombinant human M3 and M5 muscarinic receptors expressed in CHO-K1 cells.

Authors:  N Watson; D V Daniels; A P Ford; R M Eglen; S S Hegde
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Functional characterization of rat submaxillary gland muscarinic receptors using microphysiometry.

Authors:  T D Meloy; D V Daniels; S S Hegde; R M Eglen; A P Ford
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Enhancement of D1 dopamine receptor-mediated locomotor stimulation in M(4) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor knockout mice.

Authors:  J Gomeza; L Zhang; E Kostenis; C Felder; F Bymaster; J Brodkin; H Shannon; B Xia; C Deng; J Wess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The muscarinic M(5) receptor: a silent or emerging subtype?

Authors:  R M Eglen; S R Nahorski
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  The role of muscarinic cholinoceptors in the retrieval of an operant food-related conditioned reflex in cats.

Authors:  V N Khokhlova; E E Dolbakyan
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2001 May-Jun

6.  Characterization of central inhibitory muscarinic autoreceptors by the use of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor knock-out mice.

Authors:  Weilie Zhang; Anthony S Basile; Jesus Gomeza; Laura A Volpicelli; Allan I Levey; Jürgen Wess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Characterization of pre- and postsynaptic muscarinic receptors in circular muscle of pig gastric fundus.

Authors:  Pascal G Leclere; Romain A Lefebvre
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Receptor binding studies of soft anticholinergic agents.

Authors:  F Huang; P Buchwald; C E Browne; H H Farag; W M Wu; F Ji; G Hochhaus; N Bodor
Journal:  AAPS PharmSci       Date:  2001

9.  Upregulation of mRNA encoding the M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in human T- and B-lymphocytes during immunological responses.

Authors:  Takeshi Fujii; Yoshihiro Watanabe; Tomoyuki Inoue; Koichiro Kawashima
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.996

10.  Bidirectional modulation of visual plasticity by cholinergic receptor subtypes in the frog optic tectum.

Authors:  Chuan-Jiang Yu; Christopher M Butt; Elizabeth A Debski
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.