Literature DB >> 2361166

The interaction of parafluorohexahydrosiladiphenidol at muscarinic receptors in vitro.

R M Eglen1, A D Michel, W W Montgomery, E A Kunysz, C A Machado, R L Whiting.   

Abstract

1. The antagonistic actions of parafluorohexahydrosiladiphenidol (pFHHSiD) at muscarinic receptors has been studied in cardiac muscle, smooth muscle and cell culture preparations. In this paper, the classification scheme of Doods et al. (1987) is employed. This scheme is based upon differential affinities of muscarinic antagonists. pFHHSiD exhibited high pA2 values at M3 receptors mediating contractions of guinea-pig ileum and oesophageal muscularis mucosae (7.8 and 8.2 respectively) whereas low values were determined at M2 receptors mediating negative inotropic responses in guinea-pig atria (6.0). Intermediate pA2 values were determined at M1 receptors mediating contractions of the canine femoral and saphenous veins. 2. The pA2 values of pFHHSiD at receptors mediating endothelial-dependent relaxation of rat aortic rings, rabbit jugular vein and canine femoral artery (7.6-7.9) were similar to those determined on the ileum. However, the pA2 values of pFHHSiD at receptors mediating contractions of the guinea-pig trachea (7.1), which has been previously shown to possess M3 receptors, were different from those determined in the ileum. 3. The similarity in pA2 values of pFHHSiD between the M3 receptors in guinea-pig ileum and the receptors mediating endothelial-dependent relaxations provide further evidence for the role of M3 receptors in this vascular response. Taken together, pA2 values for pFHHSiD range from 7.1 to 8.2, depending upon the M3 preparation used. The selectivity of the compound therefore for the M3 versus the M2 muscarinic receptor ranged from 13 to 163 fold. 4. At muscarinic receptors mediating stimulation of phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis, pFHHSiD paradoxically displayed a high affinity for the M1 receptor in the SH-SY5Y cell line (pA2 = 7.9) as well as for the M3 receptor in the human astrocytoma (1321 NI cell line (pA2 = 7.6). The value at the M1 receptor in SH-SY5Y cells was greater than was observed at M1 receptors mediating contractions of both the canine saphenous and femoral veins (7.1). 5. pFHHSiD, therefore, clearly delineated M3 from M2 muscarinic receptors, whilst the separation between M1 and M3 receptors was variable. The reason for the anomalous affinity estimates in some functional studies remains unclear. These data indicate that the pA2 values for pFHHSiD appear to be tissue-dependent since the M3 selectivity varies according to the preparations studied. As a result the utility of pFHHSiD in muscarinic receptor classification is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2361166      PMCID: PMC1917536          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1990.tb12983.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  36 in total

1.  Primary structure and biochemical properties of an M2 muscarinic receptor.

Authors:  E G Peralta; J W Winslow; G L Peterson; D H Smith; A Ashkenazi; J Ramachandran; M I Schimerlik; D J Capon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Convenient apparatus for recording contractions of isolated heart muscle.

Authors:  J R Blinks
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 3.531

Review 3.  Muscarinic receptor subtypes: a critique of the current classification and a proposal for a working nomenclature.

Authors:  R M Eglen; R L Whiting
Journal:  J Auton Pharmacol       Date:  1986-12

4.  Subtypes of muscarinic receptors on adrenergic nerves and vascular smooth muscle of the canine saphenous vein.

Authors:  S T O'Rourke; P M Vanhoutte
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Heterogeneity of muscarinic receptors in the guinea pig esophageal muscularis mucosae and ileal longitudinal muscle.

Authors:  Y Kamikawa; K Uchida; Y Shimo
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Three types of muscarinic receptors? [proceedings].

Authors:  R B Barlow; K N Burston; A Vis
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Identification of a family of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes.

Authors:  T I Bonner; N J Buckley; A C Young; M R Brann
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Muscarinic receptors in rat sympathetic ganglia.

Authors:  D A Brown; S Fatherazi; J Garthwaite; R D White
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Characterization of alpha-1 adrenergic receptors linked to [3H]inositol metabolism in rat cerebral cortex.

Authors:  K P Minneman; R D Johnson
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Competitive and non-competitive antagonism exhibited by 'selective' antagonists at atrial and ileal muscarinic receptor subtypes.

Authors:  R M Eglen; R L Whiting
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.739

View more
  18 in total

1.  Characterization of the muscarinic receptor in isolated uterus of sham operated and ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  A Choppin; G J Stepan; D N Loury; N Watson; R M Eglen
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  M1 and M3 muscarinic receptors in human pulmonary arteries.

Authors:  X Norel; L Walch; M Costantino; C Labat; I Gorenne; E Dulmet; F Rossi; C Brink
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Different muscarinic receptor subtypes mediating the phasic activity and basal tone of pig isolated intravesical ureter.

Authors:  M Hernández; U Símonsen; D Prieto; L Rivera; P García; E Ordaz; A García-Sacristán
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  A muscarinic receptor different from the M1, M2, M3 and M4 subtypes mediates the contraction of the rabbit iris sphincter.

Authors:  I T Bognar; U Altes; C Beinhauer; I Kessler; H Fuder
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Interaction of p-F-HHSiD (p-Fluoro-hexahydrosila-difenidol) at muscarinic receptors in guinea-pig trachea.

Authors:  R M Eglen; C M Cornett; R L Whiting
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Heterogeneity of muscarinic receptors in lamb isolated coronary resistance arteries.

Authors:  U Simonsen; D Prieto; L Rivera; M Hernández; M J Mulvany; A García-Sacristán
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Selective inactivation of muscarinic M2 and M3 receptors in guinea-pig ileum and atria in vitro.

Authors:  R M Eglen; G C Harris
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Characterization of prejunctional muscarinic autoreceptors in the guinea-pig trachea.

Authors:  H Kilbinger; R Schneider; H Siefken; D Wolf; G D'Agostino
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Characterization of muscarinic receptors mediating release of epithelial derived relaxant factor (EpDRF) in guinea-pig isolated trachea.

Authors:  R M Eglen; G C Harris; M Taylor; J R Pfister; R L Whiting
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Isolated porcine bronchi provide a reliable model for development of bronchodilator anti-muscarinic agents for human use.

Authors:  G D'Agostino; A M Condino; L Gioglio; F Zonta; M Tonini; A Barbieri
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.