Literature DB >> 16200399

Energy flow and subsidies associated with the complex life cycle of ambystomatid salamanders in ponds and adjacent forest in southern Illinois.

Kurt J Regester1, Karen R Lips, Matt R Whiles.   

Abstract

Breeding adults and metamorphosing larval amphibians transfer energy between freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems during seasonal migrations and emergences, although rarely has this been quantified. We intensively sampled ambystomatid salamander assemblages (Ambystoma opacum,A. maculatum, and A. tigrinum) in five forested ponds in southern Illinois to quantify energy flow associated with egg deposition, larval production, and emergence of metamorphosed larvae. Oviposition by female salamanders added 7.0-761.4 g ash-free dry mass (AFDM) year(-1) to ponds (up to 5.5 g AFDM m(-2) year(-1)). Larval production ranged from 0.4 to 7.4 g AFDM m(-2) year(-1) among populations in three ponds that did not dry during larval development, with as much as 7.9 g AFDM m(-2) year(-1) produced by an entire assemblage. Mean larval biomass during cohort production intervals in these three ponds ranged from 0.1 to 2.3 g AFDM m(-2) and annual P/B (production/biomass) ranged from 4 to 21 for individual taxa. Emergent biomass averaged 10% (range = 2-35%) of larval production; larval mortality within ponds accounted for the difference. Hydroperiod and intraguild predation limited larval production in some ponds, but emerging metamorphs exported an average of 70.0+/-33.9 g AFDM year(-1) (range = 21.0-135.2 g AFDM year(-1)) from ponds to surrounding forest. For the three ponds where larvae survived to metamorphosis, salamander assemblages provided an average net flux of 349.5+/-140.8 g AFDM year(-1) into pond habitats. Among all ponds, net flux into ponds was highest for the largest pond and decreased for smaller ponds with higher perimeter to surface area ratios (r2 = 0.94, P<0.05, n = 5). These results are important in understanding the multiple functional roles of salamanders and the impact of amphibian population declines on ecosystems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16200399     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0266-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

Review 1.  Life history and production of stream insects.

Authors:  A D Huryn; J B Wallace
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines.

Authors:  J E Houlahan; C S Findlay; B R Schmidt; A H Meyer; S L Kuzmin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges.

Authors:  M Loreau; S Naeem; P Inchausti; J Bengtsson; J P Grime; A Hector; D U Hooper; M A Huston; D Raffaelli; B Schmid; D Tilman; D A Wardle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem function.

Authors:  J B Wallace; J R Webster
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 19.686

5.  Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide.

Authors:  Simon N Stuart; Janice S Chanson; Neil A Cox; Bruce E Young; Ana S L Rodrigues; Debra L Fischman; Robert W Waller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Predatory salamanders reverse the outcome of competition among three species of anuran tadpoles.

Authors:  P J Morin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Food web stability: the influence of trophic flows across habitats.

Authors:  G R Huxel; K McCann
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Nutrient fluxes from water to land: seabirds affect plant nutrient status on Gulf of California islands.

Authors:  Wendy B Anderson; Gary A Polis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Top-down effects of a terrestrial frog on forest nutrient dynamics.

Authors:  Karen H Beard; Kristiina A Vogt; Andrew Kulmatiski
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Whole-lake carbon-13 additions reveal terrestrial support of aquatic food webs.

Authors:  Michael L Pace; Jonathan J Cole; Stephen R Carpenter; James F Kitchell; James R Hodgson; Matthew C Van De Bogert; Darren L Bade; Emma S Kritzberg; David Bastviken
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

1.  Reciprocal subsidies in ponds: does leaf input increase frog biomass export?

Authors:  Julia E Earl; Raymond D Semlitsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Prey subsidy or predator cue? Direct and indirect effects of caged predators on aquatic consumers and resources.

Authors:  Zacharia J Costa; James R Vonesh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Grassland fire and cattle grazing regulate reptile and amphibian assembly among patches.

Authors:  Danelle M Larson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Use of toe clips as a nonlethal index of mercury accumulation and maternal transfer in amphibians.

Authors:  Brian D Todd; Christine M Bergeron; William A Hopkins
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Effects of subsidy quality on reciprocal subsidies: how leaf litter species changes frog biomass export.

Authors:  Julia E Earl; Paula O Castello; Kara E Cohagen; Raymond D Semlitsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Linking the evolution of habitat choice to ecosystem functioning: direct and indirect effects of pond-reproducing fire salamanders on aquatic-terrestrial subsidies.

Authors:  Timm Reinhardt; Sebastian Steinfartz; Achim Paetzold; Markus Weitere
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Managing artificially drained low-gradient agricultural headwaters for enhanced ecosystem functions.

Authors:  Samuel C Pierce; Robert Kröger; Reza Pezeshki
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-10

8.  Detritus Quality and Locality Determines Survival and Mass, but Not Export, of Wood Frogs at Metamorphosis.

Authors:  Joseph R Milanovich; Kyle Barrett; John A Crawford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Frog eat frog: exploring variables influencing anurophagy.

Authors:  G John Measey; Giovanni Vimercati; F André de Villiers; Mohlamatsane M Mokhatla; Sarah J Davies; Shelley Edwards; Res Altwegg
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Despite Buffers, Experimental Forest Clearcuts Impact Amphibian Body Size and Biomass.

Authors:  Jessica S Veysey Powell; Kimberly J Babbitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.