Literature DB >> 16199741

Acceptability of human papillomavirus self testing in female adolescents.

J A Kahn1, D I Bernstein, S L Rosenthal, B Huang, L M Kollar, J L Colyer, A M Tissot, P A Hillard, D Witte, P Groen, G B Slap.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop scales assessing acceptability of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in adolescents, to compare acceptability of self to clinician testing, and to identify adolescent characteristics associated with acceptability.
METHODS: Female adolescents 14-21 years of age attending a hospital based teen health centre self collected vaginal samples and a clinician, using a speculum, collected cervicovaginal samples for HPV DNA. Acceptability of and preferences for self and clinician testing were assessed at baseline and 2 week visits.
RESULTS: The mean age of the 121 participants was 17.8 years and 82% were black. The acceptability scales demonstrated good internal consistency, reliability, test-retest reliability, and factorial validity. Scores were significantly lower for self testing than clinician testing on the acceptability scale and three subscales measuring trust of the test result, confidence in one's ability to collect a specimen, and perceived effects of testing (p < 0.01). Of those who reported a preference, 73% preferred clinician to self testing. Acceptability scores for both self and clinician testing increased significantly pre-examination to post-examination (p < 0.01). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that race was independently associated with pre-examination and post-examination acceptability of self testing, and that sexual behaviours and gynaecological experiences were associated with specific acceptability subscales.
CONCLUSIONS: This sample of adolescents found clinician testing for HPV to be more acceptable than self testing and preferred clinician to self testing. If self testing for HPV is offered in the future, clinicians should not assume that adolescent patients will prefer self testing. Instead, they should educate adolescents about available testing options and discuss any concerns regarding self collection technique or accuracy of test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16199741      PMCID: PMC1745047          DOI: 10.1136/sti.2004.012047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  36 in total

1.  Presenting the facts about smoking to adolescents: effects of an autonomy-supportive style.

Authors:  G C Williams; E M Cox; R Kouides; E L Deci
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Nanda; D C McCrory; E R Myers; L A Bastian; V Hasselblad; J D Hickey; D B Matchar
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-05-16       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  With urine-based screening, do sexually active adolescent girls still need annual pelvic examinations? No: recommending annual exams is not evidence based.

Authors:  M A Shafer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-11

4.  Randomized clinical trial of PCR-determined human papillomavirus detection methods: self-sampling versus clinician-directed--biologic concordance and women's preferences.

Authors:  Diane M Harper; Walter W Noll; Dorothy R Belloni; Bernard F Cole
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.

Authors:  R M Ryan; E L Deci
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2000-01

6.  Comparison between African-American and white women in their beliefs about breast cancer and their health locus of control.

Authors:  J Barroso; S McMillan; L Casey; W Gibson; G Kaminski; J Meyer
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  Screening for cervical neoplasia by self-assessment for human papillomavirus DNA.

Authors:  P Hillemanns; R Kimmig; U Hüttemann; C Dannecker; C J Thaler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-12-04       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Self-collection of vaginal swabs for the detection of Chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis: opportunity to encourage sexually transmitted disease testing among adolescents.

Authors:  H C Wiesenfeld; D L Lowry; R P Heine; M A Krohn; H Bittner; K Kellinger; M Shultz; R L Sweet
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Comparison of self-collected vaginal, vulvar and urine samples with physician-collected cervical samples for human papillomavirus testing to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  J W Sellors; A T Lorincz; J B Mahony; I Mielzynska; A Lytwyn; P Roth; M Howard; S Chong; D Daya; W Chapman; M Chernesky
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-09-05       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Self-obtained vaginal swabs for diagnosis of treatable sexually transmitted diseases in adolescent girls.

Authors:  K Smith; K Harrington; G Wingood; M K Oh; E W Hook; R J DiClemente
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-06
View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Acceptability, Feasibility and Uptake of HPV Self-Sampling Among Immigrant Minority Women: a Focused Literature Review.

Authors:  Sarah Marshall; Mandana Vahabi; Aisha Lofters
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2019-12

2.  Human Papillomavirus Infection in Women Who Submit Self-collected Vaginal Swabs After Internet Recruitment.

Authors:  Erik J Nelson; John Hughes; J Michael Oakes; Bharat Thyagarajan; James S Pankow; Shalini L Kulasingam
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  Emerging role of HPV self-sampling in cervical cancer screening for hard-to-reach women: Focused literature review.

Authors:  Tina R Madzima; Mandana Vahabi; Aisha Lofters
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Reactions of women underscreened for cervical cancer who received unsolicited human papillomavirus self-sampling kits.

Authors:  Colin Malone; Jasmin A Tiro; Diana Sm Buist; Tara Beatty; John Lin; Kilian Kimbel; Hongyuan Gao; Chris Thayer; Diana L Miglioretti; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Accuracy and trust of self-testing for bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Jill S Huppert; Elizabeth A Hesse; Marianne Claire Bernard; Justin R Bates; Charlotte A Gaydos; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Agreement between self- and clinician-collected specimen results for detection and typing of high-risk human papillomavirus in specimens from women in Gugulethu, South Africa.

Authors:  Heidi E Jones; Bruce R Allan; Janneke H H M van de Wijgert; Lydia Altini; Sylvia M Taylor; Alana de Kock; Nicol Coetzee; Anna-Lise Williamson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Feasibility and acceptability of point-of-care testing for sexually transmissible infections among men and women in mobile van settings.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hesse; Lea E Widdice; Sherine A Patterson-Rose; Sarah St Cyr; Laura Dize; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.706

8.  Acceptability and Feasibility of Human Papilloma Virus Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Kumar Ilangovan; Erin Kobetz; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Erin N Marcus; Brendaly Rodriguez; Yisel Alonzo; Olveen Carrasquillo
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Acceptability of self-testing for trichomoniasis increases with experience.

Authors:  Jill S Huppert; Elizabeth A Hesse; Molly A Bernard; Yang Xiao; Bin Huang; Charlotte A Gaydos; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  Substantial Decline in Vaccine-Type Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Among Vaccinated Young Women During the First 8 Years After HPV Vaccine Introduction in a Community.

Authors:  Jessica A Kahn; Lea E Widdice; Lili Ding; Bin Huang; Darron R Brown; Eduardo L Franco; David I Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.