Literature DB >> 16197583

Effects of isomalt consumption on gastrointestinal and metabolic parameters in healthy volunteers.

A Gostner1, V Schäffer, S Theis, T Menzel, H Lührs, R Melcher, J Schauber, T Kudlich, G Dusel, D Dorbath, G Kozianowski, W Scheppach.   

Abstract

The polyol isomalt (Palatinit) is a well established sugar replacer. The impact of regular isomalt consumption on metabolism and parameters of gut function in nineteen healthy volunteers was examined in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial with two 4-week test periods. Volunteers received 30 g isomalt or 30 g sucrose daily as part of a controlled diet. In addition to clinical standard diagnostics, biomarkers and parameters currently discussed as risk factors for CHD, diabetes or obesity were analysed. Urine and stool Ca and phosphate excretions were measured. In addition, mean transit time, defecation frequency, stool consistency and weight were determined. Consumption of test products was affirmed by the urinary excretion of mannitol. Blood lipids were comparable in both phases, especially in volunteers with hyperlipidaemia, apart from lower apo A-1 (P=0.03) for all subjects. Remnant-like particles, oxidised LDL, NEFA, fructosamine and leptin were comparable and not influenced by isomalt. Ca and phosphate homeostasis was not affected. Stool frequency was moderately increased in the isomalt phase (P=0.006) without changes in stool consistency and stool water. This suggests that isomalt is well tolerated and that consumption of isomalt does not impair metabolic function or induce hypercalciuria. In addition, the study data indicate that isomalt could be useful in improving bowel function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16197583     DOI: 10.1079/bjn20051510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  13 in total

Review 1.  Prebiotics metabolism by gut-isolated probiotics.

Authors:  Muhamad Hanif Rawi; Siti Aisyah Zaman; Khairul Faizal Pa'ee; Sui Sien Leong; Shahrul Razid Sarbini
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Tolerable upper intake level for dietary sugars.

Authors:  Dominique Turck; Torsten Bohn; Jacqueline Castenmiller; Stefaan de Henauw; Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst; Helle Katrine Knutsen; Alexander Maciuk; Inge Mangelsdorf; Harry J McArdle; Androniki Naska; Carmen Peláez; Kristina Pentieva; Alfonso Siani; Frank Thies; Sophia Tsabouri; Roger Adan; Pauline Emmett; Carlo Galli; Mathilde Kersting; Paula Moynihan; Luc Tappy; Laura Ciccolallo; Agnès de Sesmaisons-Lecarré; Lucia Fabiani; Zsuzsanna Horvath; Laura Martino; Irene Muñoz Guajardo; Silvia Valtueña Martínez; Marco Vinceti
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 3.  Suitability of sugar alcohols as antidiabetic supplements: A review.

Authors:  Nontokozo Z Msomi; Ochuko L Erukainure; Md Shahidul Islam
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.157

Review 4.  High versus low-added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Sara Bergwall; Anna Johansson; Emily Sonestedt; Stefan Acosta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-05

5.  Novel findings on the metabolic effects of the low glycaemic carbohydrate isomaltulose (Palatinose).

Authors:  Ines Holub; Andrea Gostner; Stephan Theis; Leszek Nosek; Theodor Kudlich; Ralph Melcher; W Scheppach
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 6.  Low-calorie sweetener use and energy balance: Results from experimental studies in animals, and large-scale prospective studies in humans.

Authors:  Sharon P G Fowler
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-04-26

7.  Artificially Sweetened Beverages and the Response to the Global Obesity Crisis.

Authors:  Maria Carolina Borges; Maria Laura Louzada; Thiago Hérick de Sá; Anthony A Laverty; Diana C Parra; Josefa Maria Fellegger Garzillo; Carlos Augusto Monteiro; Christopher Millett
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Potential Markers of Dietary Glycemic Exposures for Sustained Dietary Interventions in Populations without Diabetes.

Authors:  Edith Feskens; Lorraine Brennan; Pierre Dussort; Matthieu Flourakis; Lena M E Lindner; David Mela; Naila Rabbani; Wolfgang Rathmann; Frédérique Respondek; Coen Stehouwer; Stephan Theis; Paul Thornalley; Sophie Vinoy
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 8.701

9.  Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Paige E Miller; Vanessa Perez
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 10.  Low-energy sweeteners and body weight: a citation network analysis.

Authors:  Mie Normand; Christian Ritz; David Mela; Anne Raben
Journal:  BMJ Nutr Prev Health       Date:  2021-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.