Literature DB >> 27129676

Low-calorie sweetener use and energy balance: Results from experimental studies in animals, and large-scale prospective studies in humans.

Sharon P G Fowler1.   

Abstract

For more than a decade, pioneering animal studies conducted by investigators at Purdue University have provided evidence to support a central thesis: that the uncoupling of sweet taste and caloric intake by low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) can disrupt an animal's ability to predict the metabolic consequences of sweet taste, and thereby impair the animal's ability to respond appropriately to sweet-tasting foods. These investigators' work has been replicated and extended internationally. There now exists a body of evidence, from a number of investigators, that animals chronically exposed to any of a range of LCSs - including saccharin, sucralose, acesulfame potassium, aspartame, or the combination of erythritol+aspartame - have exhibited one or more of the following conditions: increased food consumption, lower post-prandial thermogenesis, increased weight gain, greater percent body fat, decreased GLP-1 release during glucose tolerance testing, and significantly greater fasting glucose, glucose area under the curve during glucose tolerance testing, and hyperinsulinemia, compared with animals exposed to plain water or - in many cases - even to calorically-sweetened foods or liquids. Adverse impacts of LCS have appeared diminished in animals on dietary restriction, but were pronounced among males, animals genetically predisposed to obesity, and animals with diet-induced obesity. Impacts have been especially striking in animals on high-energy diets: diets high in fats and sugars, and diets which resemble a highly-processed 'Western' diet, including trans-fatty acids and monosodium glutamate. These studies have offered both support for, and biologically plausible mechanisms to explain, the results from a series of large-scale, long-term prospective observational studies conducted in humans, in which longitudinal increases in weight, abdominal adiposity, and incidence of overweight and obesity have been observed among study participants who reported using diet sodas and other LCS-sweetened beverages daily or more often at baseline. Furthermore, frequent use of diet beverages has been associated prospectively with increased long-term risk and/or hazard of a number of cardiometabolic conditions usually considered to be among the sequelae of obesity: hypertension, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, depression, kidney dysfunction, heart attack, stroke, and even cardiovascular and total mortality. Reverse causality does not appear to explain fully the increased risk observed across all of these studies, the majority of which have included key potential confounders as covariates. These have included body mass index or waist circumference at baseline; total caloric intake and specific macronutrient intake; physical activity; smoking; demographic and other relevant risk factors; and/or family history of disease. Whether non-LCS ingredients in diet beverages might have independently increased the weight gain and/or cardiometabolic risk observed among frequent consumers of LCS-sweetened beverages deserves further exploration. In the meantime, however, there is a striking congruence between results from animal research and a number of large-scale, long-term observational studies in humans, in finding significantly increased weight gain, adiposity, incidence of obesity, cardiometabolic risk, and even total mortality among individuals with chronic, daily exposure to low-calorie sweeteners - and these results are troubling.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diet beverages; Diet sodas; Low-calorie sweeteners; Non-nutritive sweeteners; Obesity; Weight

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27129676      PMCID: PMC5045440          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  108 in total

Review 1.  Nonnutritive sweeteners: current use and health perspectives: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association.

Authors:  Christopher Gardner; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Samuel S Gidding; Lyn M Steffen; Rachel K Johnson; Diane Reader; Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Influence of early dietary experience on energy regulation in rats.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers; Terry L Davidson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-10-21

3.  Abdominal adiposity and family income-to-poverty ratio in American women.

Authors:  Ike S Okosun; Francis B Annor; J Paul Seale; Michael P Eriksen
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  Influence of ovarian and non-ovarian estrogens on weight gain in response to disruption of sweet taste--calorie relations in female rats.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers; Camille H Sample; David P Katz
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  Inflammatory mediators are induced by dietary glycotoxins, a major risk factor for diabetic angiopathy.

Authors:  Helen Vlassara; Weijing Cai; Jill Crandall; Teresia Goldberg; Robert Oberstein; Veronique Dardaine; Melpomeni Peppa; Elliot J Rayfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Artificial sweeteners produce the counterintuitive effect of inducing metabolic derangements.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 12.015

7.  Synergistic interactions between commonly used food additives in a developmental neurotoxicity test.

Authors:  Karen Lau; W Graham McLean; Dominic P Williams; C Vyvyan Howard
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Improved insulin sensitivity is associated with restricted intake of dietary glycoxidation products in the db/db mouse.

Authors:  Susanna M Hofmann; Heng-Jiang Dong; Zhu Li; Weijing Cai; Jennifer Altomonte; Swan N Thung; Feng Zeng; Edward A Fisher; Helen Vlassara
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.461

9.  Experience with the high-intensity sweetener saccharin impairs glucose homeostasis and GLP-1 release in rats.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers; Alycia F Laboy; Kiely Clark; Stephanie Cooper; T L Davidson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Long-term artificial sweetener acesulfame potassium treatment alters neurometabolic functions in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Wei-na Cong; Rui Wang; Huan Cai; Caitlin M Daimon; Morten Scheibye-Knudsen; Vilhelm A Bohr; Rebecca Turkin; William H Wood; Kevin G Becker; Ruin Moaddel; Stuart Maudsley; Bronwen Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  33 in total

1.  Effect of stevia on the gut microbiota and glucose tolerance in a murine model of diet-induced obesity.

Authors:  Sarah L Becker; Edna Chiang; Anna Plantinga; Hannah V Carey; Garret Suen; Steven J Swoap
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.194

Review 2.  Nonnutritive sweeteners and cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Meghan B Azad; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan; Rasheda Rabbani; Justin Lys; Leslie Copstein; Amrinder Mann; Maya M Jeyaraman; Ashleigh E Reid; Michelle Fiander; Dylan S MacKay; Jon McGavock; Brandy Wicklow; Ryan Zarychanski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Short-Term Consumption of Sucralose with, but Not without, Carbohydrate Impairs Neural and Metabolic Sensitivity to Sugar in Humans.

Authors:  Jelle R Dalenberg; Barkha P Patel; Raphael Denis; Maria G Veldhuizen; Yuko Nakamura; Petra C Vinke; Serge Luquet; Dana M Small
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 27.287

4.  Selected health and lifestyle factors, cytosine-adenine-guanine status, and phenoconversion in Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Caroline Tanner; Karen Marder; Shirley Eberly; Kevin Biglan; David Oakes; Ira Shoulson
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 10.338

5.  Diet and physical activity as possible mediators of the association between educational attainment and body mass index gain among Australian adults.

Authors:  Emma Gearon; Anna Peeters; Winda Ng; Allison Hodge; Kathryn Backholer
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Widespread sucralose exposure in a randomized clinical trial in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Allison C Sylvetsky; Peter J Walter; H Martin Garraffo; Kim Robien; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Pharmacokinetics of Sucralose and Acesulfame-Potassium in Breast Milk Following Ingestion of Diet Soda.

Authors:  Kristina I Rother; Allison C Sylvetsky; Peter J Walter; H Martin Garraffo; David A Fields
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 8.  Contribution of macronutrients to obesity: implications for precision nutrition.

Authors:  Rodrigo San-Cristobal; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Miguel Ángel Martínez-González; José María Ordovas; José Alfredo Martínez
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 43.330

9.  Prevalence of low-calorie sweetener intake in South Asian adults.

Authors:  Yichen Jin; Allison C Sylvetsky; Namratha R Kandula; Alka M Kanaya; Sameera A Talegawkar
Journal:  Nutr Health       Date:  2018-08-13

Review 10.  Low-energy sweeteners and body weight: a citation network analysis.

Authors:  Mie Normand; Christian Ritz; David Mela; Anne Raben
Journal:  BMJ Nutr Prev Health       Date:  2021-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.