Literature DB >> 16195565

Improving assessment of postoperative pain in surgical wards by education and training.

R Karlsten1, K Ström, L Gunningberg.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: There is a need to improve postoperative pain organisation and management in hospitals. One of the most important factors in achieving this is to improve active assessment of pain in the postoperative phase.
DESIGN: Repeated audits on an annual basis over a 3 year period. Ward nurses, appointed as "pain control representatives", performed the data collection.
SETTING: Departments of general surgery and orthopaedics in a university hospital with 1200 beds. KEY MEASURE FOR IMPROVEMENT: Assessment of postoperative pain intensity using a numerical rating scale. STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: On the basis of the first audit in 1999 the team decided to introduce a mandatory training programme in postoperative pain management for all involved staff, including surgeons and ward nurses. Guidelines for postoperative care were upgraded and made accessible through the intranet. Regular staff meetings in the surgical wards with representatives from the acute pain service team were introduced. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: The assessment of pain according to protocols increased from 71% to 91% in the surgical wards and from 60% to 88% in the orthopaedic wards between 1999 and 2001/2. LESSONS LEARNT: To increase the awareness of pain and improve pain assessment, the importance of mandatory training, regular staff meetings and regular audits must be emphasised. It is also imperative to give feedback on the regular audits to the ward and staff members involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16195565      PMCID: PMC1744078          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  14 in total

1.  Acute pain services revisited--good from far, far from good?

Authors:  Narinder Rawal
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  Post-operative patients in severe pain but satisfied with pain relief.

Authors:  Ewa Idvall
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 3.  Does an acute pain service improve postoperative outcome?

Authors:  Mads U Werner; Lykke Søholm; Per Rotbøll-Nielsen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Development of an anesthesiology-based postoperative pain management service.

Authors:  L B Ready; R Oden; H S Chadwick; C Benedetti; G A Rooke; R Caplan; L M Wild
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Nursing documentation of postoperative pain management.

Authors:  Ewa Idvall; Anna Ehrenberg
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.036

6.  Refusing analgesics: using continuous improvement to improve pain management on a surgical ward.

Authors:  Eloise C J Carr
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 7.  A 10-year review of quality improvement monitoring in pain management: recommendations for standardized outcome measures.

Authors:  Debra B Gordon; Teresa A Pellino; Christine Miaskowski; Jeanette Adams McNeill; Judith A Paice; Daniel Laferriere; Marilyn Bookbinder
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 8.  10 years of acute pain services--achievements and challenges.

Authors:  N Rawal
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.288

9.  Acute pain services in Hong Kong: facilities, volume, and quality.

Authors:  C T Hung; L L Lau; C K Chan; B Chow; P T Chui; B Ho; M C Kung; J Lui; T Hui; E Ho; S F Chan; P P Chen
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.227

10.  Organization of acute pain services: a low-cost model.

Authors:  Narinder Rawal; Lars Berggren
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  8 in total

1.  [Interdisciplinary position paper "Perioperative pain management"].

Authors:  R Likar; W Jaksch; T Aigmüller; M Brunner; T Cohnert; J Dieber; W Eisner; S Geyrhofer; G Grögl; F Herbst; R Hetterle; F Javorsky; H G Kress; O Kwasny; S Madersbacher; H Mächler; R Mittermair; J Osterbrink; B Stöckl; M Sulzbacher; B Taxer; B Todoroff; A Tuchmann; A Wicker; A Sandner-Kiesling
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  A prospective audit project into the adequacy of pain assessment in the medical and surgical wards in a North London District General Hospital.

Authors:  Victoria J Atkinson; Basil Almahdi
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2014-05

3.  Improvement of Postoperative Pain Control Processes and Outcomes in Veterans of a Surgical Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Melissa S D'Andrea; P Marco Fisichella
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Observational study to assess the effectiveness of postoperative pain management of patients undergoing elective cesarean section.

Authors:  Samina Ismail; Khurram Shahzad; Faraz Shafiq
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01

5.  Pain assessment and management: An audit of practice at a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Agya B A Prempeh; Rowan Duys; Alma de Vaal; Romy Parker
Journal:  Health SA       Date:  2020-01-20

6.  Does Thirty-Minute Standardised Training Improve the Inter-Observer Reliability of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS)? A Case Study.

Authors:  Francesca Dai; Mattew Leach; Amelia Mari MacRae; Michela Minero; Emanuela Dalla Costa
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Pain Assessment: Benefits of Using Pain Scales for Surgical Patients in South Bohemian Hospitals.

Authors:  Vera Olisarova; Valerie Tothova; Martin Cerveny; Vendula Dvorakova; Petr Sadilek
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-05

8.  An innovative nonpharmacological intervention combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia increased patient global improvement in pain and satisfaction after major surgery.

Authors:  Chia-Chun Chuang; Chien-Ching Lee; Li-Kai Wang; Bor-Shyh Lin; Wen-Ju Wu; Chung-Han Ho; Jen-Yin Chen
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.570

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.