Literature DB >> 8065788

Organization of acute pain services: a low-cost model.

Narinder Rawal1, Lars Berggren.   

Abstract

It is being increasingly recognized that the solution to the problem of inadequate postoperative pain relief lies not so much in development of new techniques but in development of a formal organization for better use of existing techniques. Acute Pain Services (APS) are being increasingly established to provide good quality postoperative analgesia. In the United States such 24-h services usually consist of anesthesiologists, residents, specially trained nurses and pharmacists. However, less than 30% of US surgical population has access to APS. Furthermore, only patients selected by surgeons receive the benefits of these services. Additionally, the economic costs of such services are high (> or = $200/patient). Less expensive alternatives have to be developed if the aim is to improve the quality of postoperative analgesia for every patient after any type of surgery. Sophisticated analgesia techniques such as epidural and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) are neither necessary nor realistic for the majority of patients. Our nurse-based anesthesiologist-supervised model is based on the concept that postoperative pain relief can be greatly improved by provision of in-service training for surgical nursing staff, optimal use of systemic opioids and use of regional analgesia techniques and PCA in selected patients. Regular recording of each patient's pain intensity by VAS every 3 h and recording of treatment efficacy on a bedside vital-sign chart are the cornerstones of this model. A VAS greater than 3 is promptly treated. Surgeon and ward nurse participation are crucial in this organization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8065788     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90115-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  36 in total

Review 1.  Patient-controlled analgesia: an appropriate method of pain control in children.

Authors:  A J McDonald; M G Cooper
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Implementation of a standardized pain management in a pediatric surgery unit.

Authors:  B Messerer; A Gutmann; A Weinberg; A Sandner-Kiesling
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Improving assessment of postoperative pain in surgical wards by education and training.

Authors:  R Karlsten; K Ström; L Gunningberg
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-10

Review 4.  [Post-operative pain management in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology].

Authors:  M Giesa; J Jage; A Meurer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Acute pain therapy in German hospitals as competitive factor. Do competition, ownership and case severity influence the practice of acute pain therapy?].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; J Hinz; W Meißner; U Stamer; M Bauer; F Petzke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 6.  Cost considerations in patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  A Jacox; D B Carr; D M Mahrenholz; B M Ferrell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  [Organization of pediatric pain management: Austrian interdisciplinary recommendations for pediatric perioperative pain management].

Authors:  B Messerer; A Sandner-Kiesling
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 8.  The evolution and practice of acute pain medicine.

Authors:  Justin Upp; Michael Kent; Patrick J Tighe
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Use of local anaesthetics and adjuncts for spinal and epidural anaesthesia and analgesia at German and Austrian University Hospitals: an online survey to assess current standard practice.

Authors:  Bianca M Wahlen; Norbert Roewer; Peter Kranke
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration.

Authors:  M Wikland; S Blad; L Bungum; T Hillensjö; P O Karlström; S Nilsson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.