Literature DB >> 16194644

The relation of patient satisfaction with complaints against physicians and malpractice lawsuits.

Henry Thomas Stelfox1, Tejal K Gandhi, E John Orav, Michael L Gustafson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A small number of physicians generate a disproportionate share of complaints from patients and of malpractice lawsuits. If these grievances relate to patients' dissatisfaction with care, it might be possible to use commonly distributed patient satisfaction surveys to identify physicians at high risk of complaints from patients and of malpractice lawsuits. We sought to examine associations among patients' satisfaction survey ratings of physicians' performance and complaints from patients, risk management episodes, and rates of malpractice lawsuits. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We examined 353 physicians at a large US teaching hospital whose inpatient performance was rated by 10 or more patients between January 1, 2001, and March 31, 2003. Physicians were divided into 3 tertiles according to satisfaction on a commercial survey instrument administered to recently discharged patients. Records of unsolicited complaints from patients (January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2003) and risk management episodes (January 1, 1983, to March 31, 2003) were analyzed after adjusting for the physician's specialty and panel characteristics of the physician's patients.
RESULTS: Decreases in physicians' patient satisfaction survey scores from the highest to the lowest tertile were associated with increased rates of unsolicited complaints from patients (200 vs 243 vs 492 complaints per 100,000 patient discharges; P <0.0001) and risk management episodes (29 vs 43 vs 56 risk management episodes per 100,000 patient discharges; P = 0.007). Compared with physicians with the top satisfaction survey ratings, physicians in the middle tertile had malpractice lawsuit rates that were 26% higher (rate ratio [RR] = 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 2.18; P = 0.41), and physicians in the bottom tertile had malpractice lawsuit rates that were 110% higher (RR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.13 to 3.90; P = 0.019).
CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction survey ratings of inpatient physicians' performance are associated with complaints from patients and with risk management episodes. Commonly distributed patient satisfaction surveys may be useful quality improvement tools, but identifying physicians at high risk of complaints from patients and of malpractice lawsuits remains challenging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16194644     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  52 in total

1.  What are patients looking for?

Authors:  Steven R Feldman
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-08-18

2.  Factors associated with perceived patient-provider communication quality among Puerto Ricans.

Authors:  William A Calo; Ana P Ortiz; Vivian Colon-Lopez; Sarah Krasny; Guillemo Tortolero-Luna
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-05

3.  Use of Unsolicited Patient Observations to Identify Surgeons With Increased Risk for Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  William O Cooper; Oscar Guillamondegui; O Joe Hines; C Scott Hultman; Rachel R Kelz; Perry Shen; David A Spain; John F Sweeney; Ilene N Moore; Joseph Hopkins; Ira R Horowitz; Russell M Howerton; J Wayne Meredith; Nathan O Spell; Patricia Sullivan; Henry J Domenico; James W Pichert; Thomas F Catron; Lynn E Webb; Roger R Dmochowski; Jan Karrass; Gerald B Hickson
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Paperwork versus patient care: a nationwide survey of residents' perceptions of clinical documentation requirements and patient care.

Authors:  Melissa A Christino; Andrew P Matson; Staci A Fischer; Steven E Reinert; Christopher W Digiovanni; Paul D Fadale
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-12

5.  Understanding Waste in Health Care: Perceptions of Frontline Physicians Regarding Time Use and Appropriateness of Care They and Others Provide.

Authors:  John P Caloyeras; Michael H Kanter; Nicole R Ives; Chong Y Kim; Hemal K Kanzaria; Sandra H Berry; Robert H Brook
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2018

6.  Investigating conflict in ICUs-is the clinicians' perspective enough?

Authors:  Rachel A Schuster; Seo Yeon Hong; Robert M Arnold; Douglas B White
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Litigations in orthopedics and trauma surgery: reasons, dynamics, and profiles.

Authors:  Martin Gathen; M Jaenisch; F Fuchs; L Weinhold; M Schmid; S Koob; D C Wirtz; M D Wimmer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 8.  Negative online reviews of orthodontists: Content analysis of complaints posted by dissatisfied patients.

Authors:  Adam M Skrypczak; William A Tressel; Sara Ghayour; Roozbeh Khosravi; Douglas S Ramsay
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  How risky is caring for emergency patients at risk of malpractice litigation: a population based epidemiological study of Taiwan's experiences.

Authors:  Che-Ming Yang; Shin-Han Tsai; Wen-Ta Chiu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Communication training and patient satisfaction: A randomized trial study from Mashhad, Iran.

Authors:  Nahid Ahmadian Yazdi; Sedigheh Sadat Tavafian; Ali Emadzadeh; Anooshirvan Kazemnejad; Fazlollah Ghofranipour
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.