William O Cooper1, Oscar Guillamondegui2, O Joe Hines3, C Scott Hultman4, Rachel R Kelz5, Perry Shen6, David A Spain7, John F Sweeney8, Ilene N Moore1, Joseph Hopkins9, Ira R Horowitz8, Russell M Howerton6, J Wayne Meredith6, Nathan O Spell8, Patricia Sullivan10, Henry J Domenico11, James W Pichert1, Thomas F Catron1, Lynn E Webb1, Roger R Dmochowski12, Jan Karrass1, Gerald B Hickson13. 1. Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 2. Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 3. Division of General Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center. 4. Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 5. Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 6. Department of Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 7. Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 8. Department of Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 9. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 10. Department of Quality and Patient Safety, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia. 11. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 12. Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee2Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 13. Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee12Center for Quality, Safety and Risk Prevention, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
Importance: Unsolicited patient observations are associated with risk of medical malpractice claims. Because lawsuits may be triggered by an unexpected adverse outcome superimposed on a strained patient-physician relationship, a question remains as to whether behaviors that generate patient dissatisfaction might also contribute to the genesis of adverse outcomes themselves. Objective: To examine whether patients of surgeons with a history of higher numbers of unsolicited patient observations are at greater risk for postoperative complications than patients whose surgeons generate fewer such unsolicited patient observations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from 7 academic medical centers participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Vanderbilt Patient Advocacy Reporting System from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013. Patients older than 18 years included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent inpatient or outpatient operations at 1 of the participating sites during the study period were included. Patients were excluded if the attending surgeon had less than 24 months of data in the Vanderbilt Patient Advocacy Reporting System preceding the date of the operation. Data analysis was conducted from June 1, 2015, to October 20, 2016. Exposures: Unsolicited patient observations for the patient's surgeon in the 24 months preceding the date of the operation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Postoperative surgical or medical complications as defined by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program within 30 days of the operation of interest. Results: Among the 32 125 patients in the cohort (13 230 men, 18 895 women; mean [SD] age, 55.8 [15.8] years), 3501 (10.9%) experienced a complication, including 1754 (5.5%) surgical and 2422 (7.5%) medical complications. Prior unsolicited patient observations for a surgeon were significantly associated with the risk of a patient having any complication (odds ratio, 1.0063; 95% CI, 1.0004-1.0123; P = .03), any surgical complication (odds ratio, 1.0104; 95% CI, 1.0022-1.0186; P = .01), any medical complication (odds ratio, 1.0079; 95% CI, 1.0009-1.0148; P = .03), and being readmitted (odds ratio, 1.0088, 95% CI, 1.0024-1.0151; P = .007). The adjusted rate of complications was 13.9% higher for patients whose surgeon was in the highest quartile of unsolicited patient observations compared with patients whose surgeon was in the lowest quartile. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients whose surgeons have large numbers of unsolicited patient observations in the 24 months prior to the patient's operation are at increased risk of surgical and medical complications. Efforts to promote patient safety and address risk of malpractice claims should continue to focus on surgeons' ability to communicate respectfully and effectively with patients and other medical professionals.
Importance: Unsolicited patient observations are associated with risk of medical malpractice claims. Because lawsuits may be triggered by an unexpected adverse outcome superimposed on a strained patient-physician relationship, a question remains as to whether behaviors that generate patient dissatisfaction might also contribute to the genesis of adverse outcomes themselves. Objective: To examine whether patients of surgeons with a history of higher numbers of unsolicited patient observations are at greater risk for postoperative complications than patients whose surgeons generate fewer such unsolicited patient observations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from 7 academic medical centers participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Vanderbilt Patient Advocacy Reporting System from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013. Patients older than 18 years included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent inpatient or outpatient operations at 1 of the participating sites during the study period were included. Patients were excluded if the attending surgeon had less than 24 months of data in the Vanderbilt Patient Advocacy Reporting System preceding the date of the operation. Data analysis was conducted from June 1, 2015, to October 20, 2016. Exposures: Unsolicited patient observations for the patient's surgeon in the 24 months preceding the date of the operation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Postoperative surgical or medical complications as defined by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program within 30 days of the operation of interest. Results: Among the 32 125 patients in the cohort (13 230 men, 18 895 women; mean [SD] age, 55.8 [15.8] years), 3501 (10.9%) experienced a complication, including 1754 (5.5%) surgical and 2422 (7.5%) medical complications. Prior unsolicited patient observations for a surgeon were significantly associated with the risk of a patient having any complication (odds ratio, 1.0063; 95% CI, 1.0004-1.0123; P = .03), any surgical complication (odds ratio, 1.0104; 95% CI, 1.0022-1.0186; P = .01), any medical complication (odds ratio, 1.0079; 95% CI, 1.0009-1.0148; P = .03), and being readmitted (odds ratio, 1.0088, 95% CI, 1.0024-1.0151; P = .007). The adjusted rate of complications was 13.9% higher for patients whose surgeon was in the highest quartile of unsolicited patient observations compared with patients whose surgeon was in the lowest quartile. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients whose surgeons have large numbers of unsolicited patient observations in the 24 months prior to the patient's operation are at increased risk of surgical and medical complications. Efforts to promote patient safety and address risk of malpractice claims should continue to focus on surgeons' ability to communicate respectfully and effectively with patients and other medical professionals.
Authors: David M Studdert; Marie M Bismark; Michelle M Mello; Harnam Singh; Matthew J Spittal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Karen Mazzocco; Diana B Petitti; Kenneth T Fong; Doug Bonacum; John Brookey; Suzanne Graham; Robert E Lasky; J Bryan Sexton; Eric J Thomas Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: James W Pichert; Ilene N Moore; Jan Karrass; Jeffrey S Jay; Margaret W Westlake; Thomas F Catron; Gerald B Hickson Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2013-10
Authors: Jochen Profit; Paul J Sharek; Amber B Amspoker; Mark A Kowalkowski; Courtney C Nisbet; Eric J Thomas; Whitney A Chadwick; J Bryan Sexton Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Gerald B Hickson; Charles F Federspiel; James W Pichert; Cynthia S Miller; Jean Gauld-Jaeger; Preston Bost Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-06-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Traber Davis Giardina; Helen Haskell; Shailaja Menon; Julia Hallisy; Frederick S Southwick; Urmimala Sarkar; Kathryn E Royse; Hardeep Singh Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Brittany Couture; Maureen Fagan; Esteban Gershanik; Cathy Yoon; James Benneyan; David W Bates; Sarah A Collins Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2018-04-16
Authors: William O Cooper; David A Spain; Oscar Guillamondegui; Rachel R Kelz; Henry J Domenico; Joseph Hopkins; Patricia Sullivan; Ilene N Moore; James W Pichert; Thomas F Catron; Lynn E Webb; Roger R Dmochowski; Gerald B Hickson Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Cherie A Fathy; James W Pichert; Henry Domenico; Sahar Kohanim; Paul Sternberg; William O Cooper Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Marianne Mak-van der Vossen; Arianne Teherani; Walther N K A van Mook; Gerda Croiset; Rashmi A Kusurkar Journal: Med Educ Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 6.251