Literature DB >> 1619414

Motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in coma: analysis and relation to clinical status and outcome.

Z Ying1, U D Schmid, J Schmid, C W Hess.   

Abstract

Central sensory and motor conduction were studied in 23 comatose and three brain-dead patients. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic (magMEP) and electrical (elMEP) stimulation were recorded from the hypothenar muscle, and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded after median nerve stimulation. Comparison of clinical with evoked potential (EP) findings revealed: 1) a painful stimulus applied to the skin of the arm lowered excitation threshold to cortical stimulation and was a prerequisite to obtain MEPs in 14 instances; 2) only in braindead patients were all EPs abolished simultaneously and bilaterally; 3) MEPs (p less than or equal to 0.05, chi 2-Test), but not necessarily SEPs (p greater than 0.1) were preserved in the arms that showed normal motor reaction during clinical examination; 4) no correlation was found between EP findings and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). The results of clinical and EP testing were examined in the light of the patient's outcome 10 months later: 1) fatal outcome was predicted by a GCS of three (38% of cases, p less than or equal to 0.05, Fisher's exact test), abolished brainstem- or papillary reflexes (38%, p less than or equal to 0.05), the combination of these clinical signs (54%, p less than or equal to 0.01), bilateral abolition of elMEPs (38%, p less than or equal to 0.05), magMEPs (38%, p less than or equal to 0.05), or SEPs (23%, p greater than 0.1), or a combination of clinical and EP data (85%, p less than or equal to 0.0005); 2) good outcome was predicted by a GCS of greater than or equal to 8 only in post-traumatic coma, and EPs did not help to predict fatal outcome of coma; 1) if this appears impossible on the basis of clinical data alone; 2) if a second indicator is needed to confirm a clinical impression; 3) SEPs may be first evaluated during the acute stage of coma treatment, because they can be recorded in the presence of anaesthetic or relaxant agents; 4) MEP may be studied if outcome prediction remains ambiguous, and if the clinical situation allows for discontinuation of these agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1619414      PMCID: PMC1014903          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.55.6.470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  26 in total

1.  Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials and the Glasgow Coma Scale as predictors of outcome in comatose patients with head injuries.

Authors:  D A Houlden; C Li; M L Schwartz; M Katic
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  The assessment of severe head injury by short-latency somatosensory and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  B R Cant; A L Hume; J A Judson; N A Shaw
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-05

3.  [Motor potentials following spinal and transcranial stimulation: normal values for recording without voluntary pre-innervation].

Authors:  W Hacke; H Buchner; H Schnippering; C Karsten
Journal:  EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb       Date:  1987-12

4.  Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain.

Authors:  C W Hess; K R Mills; N M Murray
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The Glasgow-Liège Scale. Prognostic value and evolution of motor response and brain stem reflexes after severe head injury.

Authors:  J D Born
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage.

Authors:  B Jennett; M Bond
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Central somatosensory conduction time and acoustic brainstem transmission time in post-traumatic coma.

Authors:  E Rumpl; M Prugger; F Gerstenbrand; W Brunhuber; F Badry; J M Hackl
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.177

8.  Measles virus infection without rash in childhood is related to disease in adult life.

Authors:  T Rønne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-01-05       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Somatosensory evoked potentials in comatose patients: correlation with outcome and neuropathological findings.

Authors:  H Walser; M Emre; R Janzer
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Somatosensory evoked potentials following nerve and segmental stimulation do not confirm cervical radiculopathy with sensory deficit.

Authors:  U D Schmid; C W Hess; H P Ludin
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review.

Authors:  B G Carter; W Butt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  A prospective study of outcome predictors after severe brain injury in children.

Authors:  B G Carter; W Butt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 17.440

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.