Literature DB >> 2420571

The assessment of severe head injury by short-latency somatosensory and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials.

B R Cant, A L Hume, J A Judson, N A Shaw.   

Abstract

The relative prognostic value of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) was assessed in 35 patients with post-traumatic coma. Analysis of the evoked potentials was restricted to those recorded within the first 4 days following head injury. Abnormal SEPs were defined as an increase in central somatosensory conduction time or an absence of the initial cortical potential following stimulation of either median nerve. Abnormal BAEPs were classified as an increase in the wave I-V interval or the loss of any or all of its 3 most stable components (waves I, III and V) following stimulation of either ear. SEPs reliably predicted both good and bad outcomes. All 17 patients in whom SEPs were graded as normal had a favourable outcome and 15 of 18 patients in whom SEPs were abnormal had an unfavourable outcome. Although abnormal BAEPs were associated with an unfavourable outcome in almost all patients (6 of 7), only 19 of 28 patients with normal BAEPs had a favourable outcome. The finding of normal BAEPs was therefore of little prognostic significance. These results confirm the superiority and greater sensitivity of the SEP in detecting abnormalities of brain function shortly after severe head trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2420571     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(86)90053-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  16 in total

Review 1.  Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review.

Authors:  B G Carter; W Butt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Brain function in patients with cerebral fat embolism evaluated using somatosensory and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  T Morioka; H Yagi
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Listeria monocytogenes infection with rhombencephalitis.

Authors:  R W Frith; P R Buchanan; G L Glasgow
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Serial recordings of auditory brainstem responses in severe head injury: relationship between test timing and prognostic power.

Authors:  E Facco; M Munari; M Casartelli Liviero; P Caputo; A Martini; F Toffoletto; G Giron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Prognostic value of somatosensory- and motor-evoked potentials in patients with a non-traumatic coma.

Authors:  J Zentner; A Ebner
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci       Date:  1988

Review 6.  Prognostic value of somatosensory evoked potentials in comatose children: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Riccardo Carrai; Antonello Grippo; Silvia Lori; Francesco Pinto; Aldo Amantini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Cognitive event-related potentials in comatose and post-comatose states.

Authors:  Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse; Steven Laureys; Fabien Perrin
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Functional prognosis in stroke: use of somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  B D Zeman; C Yiannikas
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Somatosensory evoked potentials aiding the diagnosis of brain death.

Authors:  R Besser; U Dillmann; M Henn
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  The combined monitoring of brain stem auditory evoked potentials and intracranial pressure in coma. A study of 57 patients.

Authors:  L García-Larrea; F Artru; O Bertrand; J Pernier; F Mauguière
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.