Literature DB >> 2259399

Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials and the Glasgow Coma Scale as predictors of outcome in comatose patients with head injuries.

D A Houlden1, C Li, M L Schwartz, M Katic.   

Abstract

Median nerve somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) grades and Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC) scores were obtained from 51 patients with head injuries within 1 week after the injury to determine the relationship of these scores, both individually and combined, to outcome scores obtained more than 6 months after the injury. SSEP grading was based on the presence or absence of the cortical evoked potential, the amplitude of the early cortically generated P22 wave form, and the conduction time through the brain (P/N13-N20 interpeak latency). SSEP responses from both sides of the brain were combined and graded from 1 to 6. The GCS was graded without the verbal component (maximum score, 10), because all patients were intubated. All patients were unresponsive to commands. Median SSEP grades correlated better with Glasgow Outcome Scale and Barthel Index scores (R = 0.57 and 0.64, respectively; P less than 0.00001) than GCS scores did (R = 0.35 and 0.37, respectively, P less than 0.00001), and combining SSEP grades and GCS scores did not improve the predictive power of the model (R = 0.57 and 0.64, respectively; P less than 0.00001). All SSEP Grade 1 patients (n = 13) either died or remained in a vegetative state. In contrast, all SSEP Grade 6 patients (n = 7) had a moderate disability or good recovery. This study demonstrates the prognostic value of early quantitative median nerve SSEP grading for patients with head injuries who are unresponsive to commands within 1 week after the injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2259399     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199011000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  7 in total

Review 1.  The utility of EEG, SSEP, and other neurophysiologic tools to guide neurocritical care.

Authors:  Eric S Rosenthal
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Somatosensory evoked potentials after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Allison Bethune; Nadia Scantlebury; Ekaterina Potapova; Nicole Dinn; Victor Yang; Todd Mainprize; Mahmood Fazl; Farhad Pirouzmand; Leodante da Costa; Martin Chapman; Nicolas Phan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Positive prognostication from median-nerve somatosensory evoked cortical potentials.

Authors:  Damian Cruse; Loretta Norton; Teneille Gofton; G Bryan Young; Adrian M Owen
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in coma: analysis and relation to clinical status and outcome.

Authors:  Z Ying; U D Schmid; J Schmid; C W Hess
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 5.  [Coma. The prognostic value of evoked potentials in patients after traumatic brain injury].

Authors:  M H Morgalla; J Bauer; R Ritz; M Tatagiba
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Neuroprognostication After Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Brittany Lachance; Zhuoran Wang; Neeraj Badjatia; Xiaofeng Jia
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Value and mechanisms of EEG reactivity in the prognosis of patients with impaired consciousness: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eric Azabou; Vincent Navarro; Nathalie Kubis; Martine Gavaret; Nicholas Heming; Alain Cariou; Djillali Annane; Fréderic Lofaso; Lionel Naccache; Tarek Sharshar
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.