Literature DB >> 1619395

Detection of cryptic prey: search image or search rate?

P J Reid1, S J Shettleworth.   

Abstract

Animals' improvement in capturing cryptic prey with experience has long been attributed to a perceptual mechanism, the specific search image. Detection could also be improved by adjusting rate of search. In a series of studies using both naturalistic and operant search tasks, pigeons searched for wheat, dyed to produce 1 conspicuous and 2 equally cryptic prey types. Contrary to the predictions of the search-rate hypothesis, pigeons given a choice between the 2 cryptic types took the type experienced most recently. However, experience with 1 cryptic type improved accuracy on the other cryptic type, a result inconsistent with a search image specific to 1 prey type. Search image may better be thought of as priming of attention to those features of the prey type that best distinguish the prey from the background.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1619395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  12 in total

1.  Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Looking for inhibition of return in pigeons.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Igor Juricevic; Sara J Shettleworth; Jay Pratt; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position.

Authors:  V Maljkovic; K Nakayama
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-10

Review 4.  How camouflage works.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Monkeys show recognition without priming in a classification task.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Visual search by chimpanzees (Pan): assessment of controlling relations.

Authors:  M Tomonaga
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features.

Authors:  V Maljkovic; K Nakayama
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-11

8.  Properties of iconic and visuospatial working memory in pigeons and humans using a location change-detection procedure.

Authors:  Ken Leising; John Magnotti; Cheyenne Elliott; Jordan Nerz; Anthony Wright
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 1.926

9.  A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia).

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies.

Authors:  Jolyon Troscianko; Alice E Lown; Anna E Hughes; Martin Stevens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.