Literature DB >> 16193790

L-curve analysis of radiotherapy optimization problems.

Alexei V Chvetsov1.   

Abstract

We attempt to select an optimal value of regularization parameter in the optimization problems for intensity-modulated radiotherapy which are solved using a variational regularization technique. We apply to inverse treatment planning the L-curve method which was developed to determine the regularization parameter in the discrete ill-posed problems. The L-curve method is based on finding the regularization parameter which minimizes the residual norm which is a measure of accuracy of fit and the solution norm which is a measure of smoothness of solution. The main idea of the L-curve method is to plot the smoothing norm as a function of the residual norm for all values of the regularization parameter. This characteristic curve has an L-shaped dependence and the optimal value of regularization parameter can be found at the "corner" of the L-curve. We plot the L-curves for the optimization problems which simulate prostate radiotherapy cancer treatment with intensity-modulated beams. Different numerical methods are applied to calculate the point of maximum curvature of the L-curves which is a criterion to locate the corner. We show that the point of maximum curvature can be located in a most robust way using a formula derived from the singular value decomposition analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16193790     DOI: 10.1118/1.1949750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  3 in total

1.  Search for IMRT inverse plans with piecewise constant fluence maps using compressed sensing techniques.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Inverse planning for IMRT with nonuniform beam profiles using total-variation regularization (TVR).

Authors:  Taeho Kim; Lei Zhu; Tae-Suk Suh; Sarah Geneser; Bowen Meng; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Robust optimization in IMPT using quadratic objective functions to account for the minimum MU constraint.

Authors:  Jie Shan; Yu An; Martin Bues; Steven E Schild; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.