BACKGROUND: Despite being suitable for breast conservation surgery (BCS) a proportion of women choose mastectomy. This study aimed to assess the pre-operative pathological and geographic factors associated with choosing mastectomy rather than BCS in a single centre that serves a large geographical area encompassing urban, rural and remote island populations. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients suitable for BCS between January 2011 and December 2013 was undertaken. Pre-operative pathological features were compared using the Pearson chi squared test as was distance to the treatment centre from the patient's home. A questionnaire was sent to all those who chose mastectomy to identify the factors that influenced their decision. RESULTS: A total of 446 patients suitable for BCS were identified of which 46 (11%) chose to undergo mastectomy. Patients choosing mastectomy were more likely to present symptomatically (P=0.009), have tumours larger than 20 mm at diagnostic imaging (P=0.001) and have positive axillary staging (P=0.004). Patients choosing mastectomy were more likely to live remotely (P=0.051). Those patients who chose mastectomy felt this gave a better long-term outcome (18 patients, 44%) and peace of mind (14 patients, 34%). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse pre-operative pathological features were associated with patients choosing mastectomy rather than BCS. There was a trend for patients who chose mastectomy to live remotely from the treatment centre. Patients choosing mastectomy most commonly cited a better long-term outcome and peace of mind as the reason behind their decision. Understanding what influences a patient's surgical choice will allow clinicians and patients to engage in a fully informed pre-operative decision making process.
BACKGROUND: Despite being suitable for breast conservation surgery (BCS) a proportion of women choose mastectomy. This study aimed to assess the pre-operative pathological and geographic factors associated with choosing mastectomy rather than BCS in a single centre that serves a large geographical area encompassing urban, rural and remote island populations. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients suitable for BCS between January 2011 and December 2013 was undertaken. Pre-operative pathological features were compared using the Pearson chi squared test as was distance to the treatment centre from the patient's home. A questionnaire was sent to all those who chose mastectomy to identify the factors that influenced their decision. RESULTS: A total of 446 patients suitable for BCS were identified of which 46 (11%) chose to undergo mastectomy. Patients choosing mastectomy were more likely to present symptomatically (P=0.009), have tumours larger than 20 mm at diagnostic imaging (P=0.001) and have positive axillary staging (P=0.004). Patients choosing mastectomy were more likely to live remotely (P=0.051). Those patients who chose mastectomy felt this gave a better long-term outcome (18 patients, 44%) and peace of mind (14 patients, 34%). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse pre-operative pathological features were associated with patients choosing mastectomy rather than BCS. There was a trend for patients who chose mastectomy to live remotely from the treatment centre. Patients choosing mastectomy most commonly cited a better long-term outcome and peace of mind as the reason behind their decision. Understanding what influences a patient's surgical choice will allow clinicians and patients to engage in a fully informed pre-operative decision making process.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; breast-conserving surgery; choice behaviour; mastectomy
Authors: Anthony E Dragun; Jianmin Pan; Elizabeth C Riley; Barbara Kruse; Mary R Wilson; Shesh Rai; Dharamvir Jain Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Nancy K Janz; Rebecca L Leinberger; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Sarah T Hawley; Kent Griffith; Reshma Jagsi Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Anneke T Schroen; David R Brenin; Maria D Kelly; William A Knaus; Craig L Slingluff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Cameron D Adkisson; Sanjay P Bagaria; Alexander S Parker; Jillian M Bray; Tammeza Gibson; Colleen S Thomas; Michael G Heckman; Sarah A McLaughlin Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Lisa K Jacobs; Katherine A Kelley; Gedge D Rosson; Meagan E Detrani; David C Chang Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2008-07-29 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: David Roder; Helen Zorbas; James Kollias; Chris Pyke; David Walters; Ian Campbell; Corey Taylor; Fleur Webster Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Date: 2013
Authors: Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-10-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Philippa Youl; Shoni Philpot; Julie Moore; Michelle Morris; David E Theile Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 4.872