Literature DB >> 16191634

Host-parasitoid spatial ecology: a plea for a landscape-level synthesis.

James T Cronin1, John D Reeve.   

Abstract

A growing body of literature points to a large-scale research approach as essential for understanding population and community ecology. Many of our advances regarding the spatial ecology of predators and prey can be attributed to research with insect parasitoids and their hosts. In this review, we focus on the progress that has been made in the study of the movement and population dynamics of hosts and their parasitoids in heterogeneous landscapes, and how this research approach may be beneficial to pest management programs. To date, few studies have quantified prey and predator rates and ranges of dispersal and population dynamics at the patch level--the minimum of information needed to characterize population structure. From host-parasitoid studies with sufficient data, it is clear that the spatial scale of dispersal can differ significantly between a prey and its predators, local prey extinctions can be attributed to predators and predator extinction risk at the patch level often exceeds that of the prey. It is also evident that populations can be organized as a single, highly connected (patchy) population or as semi-independent extinction-prone local populations that collectively form a persistent metapopulation. A prey and its predators can also differ in population structure. At the landscape level, agricultural studies indicate that predator effects on its prey often spill over between the crop and surrounding area (matrix) and can depend strongly on landscape structure (e.g. the proportion of suitable habitat) at scales extending well beyond the crop margins. In light of existing empirical data, predator-prey models are typically spatially unrealistic, lacking important details on boundary responses and movement behaviour within and among patches. The tools exist for conducting empirical and theoretical research at the landscape level and we hope that this review calls attention to fertile areas for future exploration.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16191634      PMCID: PMC1560191          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

Review 1.  Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture.

Authors:  D A Landis; S D Wratten; G M Gurr
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape.

Authors:  I Hanski; O Ovaskainen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Habitat structure and population persistence in an experimental community.

Authors:  S P Ellner; E McCauley; B E Kendall; C J Briggs; P R Hosseini; S N Wood; A Janssen; M W Sabelis; P Turchin; R M Nisbet; W W Murdoch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Periodic local disturbance in host-parasitoid metapopulations: host suppression and parasitoid persistence.

Authors:  Dylan Z Childs; Michael B Bonsall; Mark Rees
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-03-07       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  The landscape context of cereal aphid-parasitoid interactions.

Authors:  Carsten Thies; Indra Roschewitz; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Habitat fragmentation, species loss, and biological control.

Authors:  A Kruess; T Tscharntke
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-06-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  T H Ricketts
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Landscape structure and biological control in agroecosystems

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Host-parasitoid extinction and colonization in a fragmented prairie landscape.

Authors:  James T Cronin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-04-17       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Diffusion models for animals in complex landscapes: incorporating heterogeneity among substrates, individuals and edge behaviours.

Authors:  John D Reeve; James T Cronin; Kyle J Haynes
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  19 in total

1.  Responses of parasitoids to saproxylic hosts and habitat: a multi-scale study using experimental logs.

Authors:  H Gibb; J Hilszczański; J Hjältén; K Danell; J P Ball; R B Pettersson; O Alinvi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Inferring stratified parasitoid dispersal mechanisms and parameters from coarse data using mathematical and Bayesian methods.

Authors:  Christopher Strickland; Nadiah P Kristensen; Laura Miller
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Spatial and temporal genetic structure at the fourth trophic level in a fragmented landscape.

Authors:  Abhilash Nair; Toby Fountain; Suvi Ikonen; Sami P Ojanen; Saskya van Nouhuys
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Drivers of symbiont diversity in freshwater snails: a comparative analysis of resource availability, community heterogeneity, and colonization opportunities.

Authors:  Keegan McCaffrey; Pieter T J Johnson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops.

Authors:  Alexandra-Maria Klein; Bernard E Vaissière; James H Cane; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Can chemical communication be cryptic? Adaptations by herbivores to natural enemies exploiting prey semiochemistry.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa; Kenneth R Hobson; Sara Lafontaine; Brian H Aukema
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Habitat connectivity and resident shared predators determine the impact of invasive bullfrogs on native frogs in farm ponds.

Authors:  Takashi Atobe; Yutaka Osada; Hayato Takeda; Misako Kuroe; Tadashi Miyashita
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  You are what you eat: fatty acid profiles as a method to track the habitat movement of an insect.

Authors:  Stephen K Bayes; Marc K Hellerstein; Mark Fitch; Nicholas J Mills; Stephen C Welter
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Host-plant species conservatism and ecology of a parasitoid fig wasp genus (Chalcidoidea; Sycoryctinae; Arachonia).

Authors:  Michael J McLeish; Gary Beukman; Simon van Noort; Theresa C Wossler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on abundance, larval food and parasitism of a spider-hunting wasp.

Authors:  Valérie Coudrain; Felix Herzog; Martin H Entling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.