Literature DB >> 11484053

Habitat structure and population persistence in an experimental community.

S P Ellner1, E McCauley, B E Kendall, C J Briggs, P R Hosseini, S N Wood, A Janssen, M W Sabelis, P Turchin, R M Nisbet, W W Murdoch.   

Abstract

Understanding spatial population dynamics is fundamental for many questions in ecology and conservation. Many theoretical mechanisms have been proposed whereby spatial structure can promote population persistence, in particular for exploiter-victim systems (host-parasite/pathogen, predator-prey) whose interactions are inherently oscillatory and therefore prone to extinction of local populations. Experiments have confirmed that spatial structure can extend persistence, but it has rarely been possible to identify the specific mechanisms involved. Here we use a model-based approach to identify the effects of spatial population processes in experimental systems of bean plants (Phaseolus lunatus), herbivorous mites (Tetranychus urticae) and predatory mites (Phytoseiulus persimilis). On isolated plants, and in a spatially undivided experimental system of 90 plants, prey and predator populations collapsed; however, introducing habitat structure allowed long-term persistence. Using mechanistic models, we determine that spatial population structure did not contribute to persistence, and spatially explicit models are not needed. Rather, habitat structure reduced the success of predators at locating prey outbreaks, allowing between-plant asynchrony of local population cycles due to random colonization events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11484053     DOI: 10.1038/35087580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  30 in total

Review 1.  Host-parasitoid spatial ecology: a plea for a landscape-level synthesis.

Authors:  James T Cronin; John D Reeve
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Density-dependent dispersal and spatial population dynamics.

Authors:  Rolf A Ims; Harry P Andreassen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Persistence of spatial populations depends on returning home.

Authors:  Alan Hastings; Louis W Botsford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Metapopulation extinction risk is increased by environmental stochasticity and assemblage complexity.

Authors:  James C Bull; Nicola J Pickup; Brian Pickett; Michael P Hassell; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Diversity of protists and bacteria determines predation performance and stability.

Authors:  Muhammad Saleem; Ingo Fetzer; Hauke Harms; Antonis Chatzinotas
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 6.  Using artificial systems to explore the ecology and evolution of symbioses.

Authors:  Babak Momeni; Chi-Chun Chen; Kristina L Hillesland; Adam Waite; Wenying Shou
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Changes in habitat complexity negatively affect diverse gastropod assemblages in coralline algal turf.

Authors:  B P Kelaher
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Dispersal distance is influenced by parental and grand-parental density.

Authors:  E V Bitume; D Bonte; O Ronce; I Olivieri; C M Nieberding
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Predation and fragmentation portrayed in the statistical structure of prey time series.

Authors:  Ditte K Hendrichsen; Chris J Topping; Mads C Forchhammer
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 2.964

10.  Optimizing metapopulation sustainability through a checkerboard strategy.

Authors:  Yossi Ben Zion; Gur Yaari; Nadav M Shnerb
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.