Literature DB >> 27226470

Spatial and temporal genetic structure at the fourth trophic level in a fragmented landscape.

Abhilash Nair1, Toby Fountain2, Suvi Ikonen2, Sami P Ojanen2, Saskya van Nouhuys3.   

Abstract

A fragmented habitat becomes increasingly fragmented for species at higher trophic levels, such as parasitoids. To persist, these species are expected to possess life-history traits, such as high dispersal, that facilitate their ability to use resources that become scarce in fragmented landscapes. If a specialized parasitoid disperses widely to take advantage of a sparse host, then the parasitoid population should have lower genetic structure than the host. We investigated the temporal and spatial genetic structure of a hyperparasitoid (fourth trophic level) in a fragmented landscape over 50 × 70 km, using microsatellite markers, and compared it with the known structures of its host parasitoid, and the butterfly host which lives as a classic metapopulation. We found that population genetic structure decreases with increasing trophic level. The hyperparasitoid has fewer genetic clusters (K = 4), than its host parasitoid (K = 15), which in turn is less structured than the host butterfly (K = 27). The genetic structure of the hyperparasitoid also shows temporal variation, with genetic differentiation increasing due to reduction of the population size, which reduces the effective population size. Overall, our study confirms the idea that specialized species must be dispersive to use a fragmented host resource, but that this adaptation has limits.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hyposoter horticola; Melitaea cinxia; dispersal; host–parasitoid system; hyperparasitoid; oviposition behaviour

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27226470      PMCID: PMC4892806          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  33 in total

Review 1.  Effects of metapopulation processes on measures of genetic diversity.

Authors:  J R Pannell; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Bayesian analysis of genetic differentiation between populations.

Authors:  Jukka Corander; Patrik Waldmann; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Host-parasitoid spatial ecology: a plea for a landscape-level synthesis.

Authors:  James T Cronin; John D Reeve
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Complementary sex determination substantially increases extinction proneness of haplodiploid populations.

Authors:  Amro Zayed; Laurence Packer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Identifying the environmental factors that determine the genetic structure of populations.

Authors:  Matthieu Foll; Oscar Gaggiotti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A parasitoid wasp uses landmarks while monitoring potential resources.

Authors:  Saskya van Nouhuys; Riikka Kaartinen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Sex determination in the hymenoptera.

Authors:  George E Heimpel; Jetske G de Boer
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 19.686

8.  Metapopulation genetic structure of two coexisting parasitoids of the Glanville fritillary butterfly.

Authors:  Maaria Kankare; Saskya van Nouhuys; Oscar Gaggiotti; Ilkka Hanski
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Fitness effects and transmission routes of a microsporidian parasite infecting Drosophila and its parasitoids.

Authors:  P H Futerman; S J Layen; M L Kotzen; C Franzen; A R Kraaijeveld; H C J Godfray
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Population structure of a large blue butterfly and its specialist parasitoid in a fragmented landscape.

Authors:  Christian Anton; Inga Zeisset; Martin Musche; Walter Durka; Jacobus J Boomsma; Josef Settele
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  5 in total

1.  Different genetic structures revealed resident populations of a specialist parasitoid wasp in contrast to its migratory host.

Authors:  Shu-Jun Wei; Yuan Zhou; Xu-Lei Fan; Ary A Hoffmann; Li-Jun Cao; Xue-Xin Chen; Zai-Fu Xu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Local adaptation at higher trophic levels: contrasting hyperparasite-pathogen infection dynamics in the field and laboratory.

Authors:  Steven R Parratt; Benoit Barrès; Rachel M Penczykowski; Anna-Liisa Laine
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Increased fluctuation in a butterfly metapopulation leads to diploid males and decline of a hyperparasitoid.

Authors:  Abhilash Nair; Etsuko Nonaka; Saskya van Nouhuys
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The microbiome of the Melitaea cinxia butterfly shows marked variation but is only little explained by the traits of the butterfly or its host plant.

Authors:  Guillaume Minard; Gleb Tikhonov; Otso Ovaskainen; Marjo Saastamoinen
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.491

5.  Host-plant availability drives the spatiotemporal dynamics of interacting metapopulations across a fragmented landscape.

Authors:  Øystein H Opedal; Otso Ovaskainen; Marjo Saastamoinen; Anna-Liisa Laine; Saskya van Nouhuys
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.499

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.