Literature DB >> 16190776

Modeling water molecules in protein-ligand docking using GOLD.

Marcel L Verdonk1, Gianni Chessari, Jason C Cole, Michael J Hartshorn, Christopher W Murray, J Willem M Nissink, Richard D Taylor, Robin Taylor.   

Abstract

We implemented a novel approach to score water mediation and displacement in the protein-ligand docking program GOLD. The method allows water molecules to switch on and off and to rotate around their three principal axes. A constant penalty, sigma(p), representing the loss of rigid-body entropy, is added for water molecules that are switched on, hence rewarding water displacement. We tested the methodology in an extensive validation study. First, sigma(p) is optimized against a training set of 58 protein-ligand complexes. For this training set, our algorithm correctly predicts water mediation/displacement in approximately 92% of the cases. We observed small improvements in the quality of the predicted binding modes for water-mediated complexes. In the second part of this work, an entirely independent set of 225 complexes is used. For this test set, our algorithm correctly predicts water mediation/displacement in approximately 93% of the cases. Improvements in binding mode quality were observed for individual water-mediated complexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16190776     DOI: 10.1021/jm050543p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  84 in total

1.  A force field with discrete displaceable waters and desolvation entropy for hydrated ligand docking.

Authors:  Stefano Forli; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?

Authors:  Oliver Korb; Tim Ten Brink; Fredrick Robin Devadoss Victor Paul Raj; Matthias Keil; Thomas E Exner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Pose prediction and virtual screening performance of GOLD scoring functions in a standardized test.

Authors:  John W Liebeschuetz; Jason C Cole; Oliver Korb
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Improved ligand-protein binding affinity predictions using multiple binding modes.

Authors:  Eva Stjernschantz; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Improving protein-ligand docking with flexible interfacial water molecules using SWRosettaLigand.

Authors:  Linqing Li; Weiwei Xu; Qiang Lü
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Tetrahydrobiopterin regulates monoamine neurotransmitter sulfonation.

Authors:  Ian Cook; Ting Wang; Thomas S Leyh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Lithocholic acid is an endogenous inhibitor of MDM4 and MDM2.

Authors:  Simon M Vogel; Matthias R Bauer; Andreas C Joerger; Rainer Wilcken; Tobias Brandt; Dmitry B Veprintsev; Trevor J Rutherford; Alan R Fersht; Frank M Boeckler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance.

Authors:  William J Allen; Trent E Balius; Sudipto Mukherjee; Scott R Brozell; Demetri T Moustakas; P Therese Lang; David A Case; Irwin D Kuntz; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  The gate that governs sulfotransferase selectivity.

Authors:  Ian Cook; Ting Wang; Steven C Almo; Jungwook Kim; Charles N Falany; Thomas S Leyh
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Free enthalpies of replacing water molecules in protein binding pockets.

Authors:  Sereina Riniker; Luzi J Barandun; François Diederich; Oliver Krämer; Andreas Steffen; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.