Literature DB >> 16190756

DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.

Hans F G Velec1, Holger Gohlke, Gerhard Klebe.   

Abstract

Following the formalism used for the development of the knowledge-based scoring function DrugScore, new distance-dependent pair potentials are obtained from nonbonded interactions in small organic molecule crystal packings. Compared to potentials derived from protein-ligand complexes, the better resolved small molecule structures provide relevant contact data in a more balanced distribution of atom types and produce potentials of superior statistical significance and more detailed shape. Applied to recognizing binding geometries of ligands docked into proteins, this new scoring function (DrugScore(CSD)) ranks the crystal structures of 100 protein-ligand complexes best among up to 100 generated decoy geometries in 77% of all cases. Accepting root-mean-square deviations (rmsd) of up to 2 angstroms from the native pose as well-docked solutions, a correct binding mode is found in 87% of the cases. This translates into an improvement of the new scoring function of 57% with respect to the retrieval of the crystal structure and 20% with respect to the identification of a well-docked ligand pose compared to the original Protein Data Bank-based DrugScore. In the analysis of decoy geometries of cross-docking studies, DrugScore(CSD) shows equivalent or increased performance compared to the original PDB-based DrugScore. Furthermore, DrugScore(CSD) predicts binding affinities convincingly. Reducing the set of docking solutions to examples that deviate increasingly from the native pose results in a loss of performance of DrugScore(CSD). This indicates that a necessary prerequisite to successfully resolving the scoring problem with a more discriminative scoring function is the generation of highly accurate ligand poses, which approximate the native pose to below 1 angstroms rmsd, in a docking run.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16190756     DOI: 10.1021/jm050436v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  86 in total

1.  Robust scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions with quantum chemical charge models.

Authors:  Jui-Chih Wang; Jung-Hsin Lin; Chung-Ming Chen; Alex L Perryman; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Scoring and lessons learned with the CSAR benchmark using an improved iterative knowledge-based scoring function.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  A quantum mechanics-based halogen bonding scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Zhuo Yang; Yingtao Liu; Zhaoqiang Chen; Zhijian Xu; Jiye Shi; Kaixian Chen; Weiliang Zhu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Brian K Shoichet; John J Irwin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 5.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Assessment of programs for ligand binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Ryangguk Kim; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 7.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Gregory Sliwoski; Sandeepkumar Kothiwale; Jens Meiler; Edward W Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 25.468

8.  Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; John J Irwin; Guangqiang Dong; Brian K Shoichet; Andrej Sali
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Accounting for ligand conformational restriction in calculations of protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Cen Gao; Min-Sun Park; Harry A Stern
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.