Literature DB >> 16187274

High-resolution steady-state free precession coronary magnetic resonance angiography within a breath-hold: parallel imaging with extended cardiac data acquisition.

Jaeseok Park1, Andrew C Larson, Qiang Zhang, Orlando Simonetti, Debiao Li.   

Abstract

Coronary artery imaging data are conventionally acquired in a single imaging frame during mid-diastole. The data acquisition window must be sufficiently short to avoid cardiac motion artifacts. A short data acquisition window results in decreased imaging efficiency and limited spatial resolution. Parallel imaging may lessen these limitations, but requires highly accurate coil sensitivity. The purpose of this work was to increase the imaging efficiency and spatial resolution in coronary artery imaging using parallel imaging with an extended acquisition window. External coil calibration data were acquired before and after a short mid-diastolic period of accelerated imaging data acquisition. It was assumed that residual cardiac motion in the extended acquisition window would not impede accurate estimation of coil sensitivity since only low spatial frequency signals were acquired for coil calibration. Experimental studies were performed in five healthy volunteers at 3 T using steady-state free precession sequence. Statistical comparison was made between the proposed method and conventional data acquisition for visual quality of image and vessel sharpness. The proposed technique demonstrated higher visual grading and improved vessel sharpness. The proposed method is a new approach to enhance the imaging efficiency and spatial resolution in coronary artery imaging. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16187274      PMCID: PMC1479312          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  16 in total

1.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Tailored SMASH image reconstructions for robust in vivo parallel MR imaging.

Authors:  D K Sodickson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  3D magnetization-prepared true-FISP: a new technique for imaging coronary arteries.

Authors:  V S Deshpande; S M Shea; G Laub; O P Simonetti; J P Finn; D Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Generalized SMASH imaging.

Authors:  Mark Bydder; David J Larkman; Joseph V Hajnal
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  A generalized approach to parallel magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D K Sodickson; C A McKenzie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  VD-AUTO-SMASH imaging.

Authors:  R M Heidemann; M A Griswold; A Haase; P M Jakob
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Coronary artery imaging: 3D segmented k-space data acquisition with multiple breath-holds and real-time slab following.

Authors:  S M Shea; R M Kroeker; V Deshpande; G Laub; J Zheng; J P Finn; D Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Fat-suppressed steady-state free precession imaging using phase detection.

Authors:  Brian A Hargreaves; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Krishna S Nayak; Bob S Hu; Dwight G Nishimura
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Parallel imaging reconstruction using automatic regularization.

Authors:  Fa-Hsuan Lin; Kenneth K Kwong; John W Belliveau; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  AUTO-SMASH: a self-calibrating technique for SMASH imaging. SiMultaneous Acquisition of Spatial Harmonics.

Authors:  P M Jakob; M A Griswold; R R Edelman; D K Sodickson
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Parallel magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ulrich Katscher; Peter Börnert
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Visual grading regression: analysing data from visual grading experiments with regression models.

Authors:  O Smedby; M Fredrikson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Comparison of visual grading and free-response ROC analyses for assessment of image-processing algorithms in digital mammography.

Authors:  F Zanca; C Van Ongeval; F Claus; J Jacobs; R Oyen; H Bosmans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.