Literature DB >> 1618670

Radiation therapy for skin cancer near the eye: kilovoltage x-rays versus electrons.

R J Amdur1, K J Kalbaugh, L M Ewald, J T Parsons, W M Mendenhall, F J Bova, R R Million.   

Abstract

When skin cancer near the eye is irradiated, a corneal shield is placed between the lids and globe to protect ocular structures. The effectiveness of the shield was evaluated with 250 kVp x-ray and 6-20 MeV electron beams. To simulate the clinical situation, a face phantom was constructed out of solid pieces of water-equivalent epoxy. In the region of the eye the phantom was milled to the exact contour of a human face. The phantom was used to reconstruct the setup that had been used to treat a patient with a 1-cm basal cell carcinoma of the mid portion of the lower lid. A medium-sized corneal shield (2-mm-thick lead plated with 0.1 mm gold) was placed on the eye portion of the phantom. A contoured lead (6 mm thick) face mask was placed on the surface of the phantom to define a 3-cm diameter radiation field that included only the inferior hemisphere of the shield. The doses that the cornea, lens, and retina would receive beneath the midpoint of the inferior hemisphere of the shield were measured using thermoluminescent and film dosimetry. With 6 to 8 MeV electrons, the corneal dose was 2 to 4 times higher than with 250 kVp x-rays. Corneal and lens doses rose rapidly with increasing electron beam energy such that with greater than 8 MeV the shield would provide relatively poor ocular protection. A scanning ion chamber and film dosimetry were used to determine the isodose profiles of 250 kVp x-ray and 6 MeV electron beams for a 3-cm diameter field collimated on the surface. With 250 kVp x-rays the 95% isodose area was 32% wider than with 6 MeV electrons. The ease of shielding and the ability to minimize field size argue in favor of kilovoltage x-rays for early-stage skin cancer near the eye.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1618670     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90650-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  Effect of the bone heterogeneity on the dose prescription in orthovoltage radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Grigor N Grigorov
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-11-15

Review 2.  Preservation of form and function in the management of head and neck skin cancer.

Authors:  Michael Poulsen; Bryan Burmeister; Dan Kennedy
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Reirradiation for Recurrent Scalp Angiosarcoma: Dosimetric Advantage of PBT over VMAT and EBT.

Authors:  Tal Eitan; Nicholas J Damico; Rajesh Pidikiti; Michael Z Kharouta; Donald Dobbins; Frederick B Jesseph; Mark Smith; Ankit Mangla; Theodoros N Teknos; David B Mansur; Mitchell Machtay; Min Yao; Aashish D Bhatt
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2019-12-16

4.  COMP report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for kilovoltage X ray radiotherapy machines.

Authors:  Christophe Furstoss
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Calculation of excess dose to the eye phantom due to a distanced shielding for electron therapy in head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Keyvan Jabbari; Mahnaz Roayaei; Hosein Saberi
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2012-07

Review 6.  Novel treatment options for nonmelanoma skin cancer: focus on electronic brachytherapy.

Authors:  Michael E Kasper; Ahmed A Chaudhary
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-11-26

7.  Experimental verification of the application of lateral buildup ratio on the 4-MeV electron beam.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Scott Newman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.