Linda M Hunt1, Katherine B de Voogd. 1. Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, 354 Baker Hall, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA. huntli@msu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cultural competency is now a requirement in the curriculum of many health professions. However, clinicians' understandings of cultural difference, the accuracy of those understandings, and their impact on patient care have not yet been carefully explored. The authors conducted an ethnographic study designed to describe clinicians' views of Latino culture in the context of amniocentesis decision making, compared those to patients' discussions of their decision making, and explored how clinicians' views about culture are manifested in consultations with Latinas. METHOD: Between 2000 and 2002, semistructured, open-ended interviews were conducted in southern Texas with convenience samples of 50 clinicians who discuss prenatal testing with patients, and 40 self-identified Latina patients who had been offered amniocentesis. Observations were also made of 101 genetic counseling sessions. Content analysis focused on the cultural characteristics clinicians identified as affecting Latinas' decision making, patients' self-reported decision-making processes, and clinician and patient comments and actions observed during genetics counseling sessions. RESULTS: Most clinicians said Latinas are likely to decline amniocentesis because they are religious, fatalistic, male-dominated, family-centered, and superstitious. However, patients' discussions of their decision making were not consistent with these characterizations. Furthermore, clinicians reported providing less complete information to Latina patients in their efforts to be culturally sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing patient and clinician interviews bring into question clinicians' notion of Latino culture's role in amniocentesis decision making. Efforts to be "culturally competent," in the absence of a patient-centered approach, may unintentionally encourage stereotyping, thereby negatively affecting the quality and content of clinical care.
PURPOSE: Cultural competency is now a requirement in the curriculum of many health professions. However, clinicians' understandings of cultural difference, the accuracy of those understandings, and their impact on patient care have not yet been carefully explored. The authors conducted an ethnographic study designed to describe clinicians' views of Latino culture in the context of amniocentesis decision making, compared those to patients' discussions of their decision making, and explored how clinicians' views about culture are manifested in consultations with Latinas. METHOD: Between 2000 and 2002, semistructured, open-ended interviews were conducted in southern Texas with convenience samples of 50 clinicians who discuss prenatal testing with patients, and 40 self-identified Latina patients who had been offered amniocentesis. Observations were also made of 101 genetic counseling sessions. Content analysis focused on the cultural characteristics clinicians identified as affecting Latinas' decision making, patients' self-reported decision-making processes, and clinician and patient comments and actions observed during genetics counseling sessions. RESULTS: Most clinicians said Latinas are likely to decline amniocentesis because they are religious, fatalistic, male-dominated, family-centered, and superstitious. However, patients' discussions of their decision making were not consistent with these characterizations. Furthermore, clinicians reported providing less complete information to Latina patients in their efforts to be culturally sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing patient and clinician interviews bring into question clinicians' notion of Latino culture's role in amniocentesis decision making. Efforts to be "culturally competent," in the absence of a patient-centered approach, may unintentionally encourage stereotyping, thereby negatively affecting the quality and content of clinical care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship
Authors: Seena L Zierler-Brown; Jenny A VanAmburgh; Kristin A Casper; Linda L Krypel; Amista Lone Salcido; Victor A Padron; W Steven Pray; Andrea L Wall; Jenelle L Sobotka; Janet P Engle Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2006-12-15 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Ana E Abraído-Lanza; Anahí Viladrich; Karen R Flórez; Amarilis Céspedes; Alejandra N Aguirre; Ana Alicia De La Cruz Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2007 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Anna C Martinez-Hume; Allison M Baker; Hannah S Bell; Isabel Montemayor; Kristan Elwell; Linda M Hunt Journal: Cult Med Psychiatry Date: 2017-03
Authors: Sarah Guerra Seth; Thomas Goka; Andrea Harbison; Lisa Hollier; Susan Peterson; Lois Ramondetta; Sarah Jane Noblin Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2011-06-22 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Ginger J Tsai; Carrie A Cameron; Jennifer L Czerwinski; Hector Mendez-Figueroa; Susan K Peterson; Sarah Jane Noblin Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2017-03-02 Impact factor: 2.537