Literature DB >> 16183013

Switching from reservoir to matrix systems for the transdermal delivery of fentanyl: a prospective, multicenter pilot study in outpatients with chronic pain.

Rainer Freynhagen1, Hans Jürgen von Giesen, Peter Busche, Rainer Sabatowski, Christhoph Konrad, Stefan Grond.   

Abstract

Matrix systems for transdermal fentanyl will replace the reservoir systems in Europe. In an industry-independent, prospective, multicenter pilot study, 46 outpatients with chronic pain were asked to assess pain intensity, sleep interference, adverse events, and multiple secondary parameters during administration of the last reservoir and the first two matrix patches. There was no difference in pain intensity, sleep interference, and the rate of adverse events between both systems. Self assessment on a 6-step numeric rating scale (1 = very good, 6 = insufficient) comparing the two systems (reservoir vs. matrix) showed that skin compatibility (2.6 vs. 1.5), adhesive properties (3.2 vs. 1.8), wearability/comfort (2.8 vs. 1.5), and general satisfaction (2.5 vs. 1.8) improved significantly with the new matrix technology. At study endpoint, 91% of patients preferred the matrix system for future use. The new fentanyl matrix system is characterized by a high level of general satisfaction, ease of use, patient acceptance, and improved skin compatibility. Reservoir and matrix systems appear to have comparable efficacy and safety so that outpatients can be switched directly from the reservoir to the matrix system without difficulties and new dose titration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16183013     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  10 in total

1.  Comparative bioequivalence study between a novel matrix transdermal delivery system of fentanyl and a commercially available reservoir formulation.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Marier; Mary Lor; Josée Morin; Lionel Roux; Marika Di Marco; Gaetano Morelli; Eva Aggerholm Saedder
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Six- versus 12-h conversion method from intravenous to transdermal fentanyl in chronic cancer pain: a randomized study.

Authors:  Motoo Nomura; Minoru Kamata; Hiroyuki Kojima; Kenji Hayashi; Masasuke Kozai; Satoshi Sawada
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-06-13       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Fentanyl Formulations in the Management of Pain: An Update.

Authors:  Stephan A Schug; Sonya Ting
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Multicenter clinical study for evaluation of efficacy and safety of transdermal fentanyl matrix patch in treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain in 474 chinese cancer patients.

Authors:  Yu-Lin Zhu; Guo-Hong Song; Duan-Qi Liu; Xi Zhang; Kui-Feng Liu; Ai-Hua Zang; Ying Cheng; Guo-Chun Cao; Jun Liang; Xue-Zhen Ma; Xin Ding; Bin Wang; Wei-Lian Li; Zuo-Wei Hu; Gang Feng; Jiang-Jin Huang; Xiao Zheng; Shun-Chang Jiao; Rong Wu; Jun Ren
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Fentanyl transdermal matrix patch (Durotep MT patch; Durogesic DTrans; Durogesic SMAT): in adults with cancer-related pain.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Transdermal fentanyl: pharmacology and toxicology.

Authors:  Lewis Nelson; Robert Schwaner
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2009-12

7.  Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic study of a novel fentanyl-containing matrix transdermal patch system in Japanese patients with cancer pain.

Authors:  Toyo Miyazaki; Kazuo Hanaoka; Akiyoshi Namiki; Setsuro Ogawa; Toshimitsu Kitajima; Toyoshi Hosokawa; Tomozo Ishida; Shoji Nogami; Shigeto Mashimo
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Epidemiology of regular prescribed opioid use: results from a national, population-based survey.

Authors:  Teresa J Hudson; Mark J Edlund; Diane E Steffick; Shanti P Tripathi; Mark D Sullivan
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Formulations of fentanyl for the management of pain.

Authors:  Sina Grape; Stephan A Schug; Stefan Lauer; Barbara S Schug
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  The use of rotation to fentanyl in cancer-related pain.

Authors:  Delia Dima; Ciprian Tomuleasa; Ioana Frinc; Sergiu Pasca; Lorand Magdo; Ioana Berindan-Neagoe; Mihai Muresan; Cosmin Lisencu; Alexandru Irimie; Mihnea Zdrenghea
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.133

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.