Literature DB >> 23359267

Multicenter clinical study for evaluation of efficacy and safety of transdermal fentanyl matrix patch in treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain in 474 chinese cancer patients.

Yu-Lin Zhu1, Guo-Hong Song, Duan-Qi Liu, Xi Zhang, Kui-Feng Liu, Ai-Hua Zang, Ying Cheng, Guo-Chun Cao, Jun Liang, Xue-Zhen Ma, Xin Ding, Bin Wang, Wei-Lian Li, Zuo-Wei Hu, Gang Feng, Jiang-Jin Huang, Xiao Zheng, Shun-Chang Jiao, Rong Wu, Jun Ren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although a new matrix formulation fentanyl has been used throughout the world for cancer pain management, few data about its efficacy and clinical outcomes associated with its use in Chinese patients have been obtained. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the new system in Chinese patients with moderate to severe cancer pain.
METHODS: A total of 474 patients with moderate to severe cancer pain were enrolled in this study and were treated with the new transdermal fentanyl matrix patch (TDF) up to 2 weeks. All the patients were asked to record pain intensity, side effects, quality of life (QOL), adherence and global satisfaction. The initial dose of fentanyl was 25 μg/h titrated with opioid or according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Transdermal fentanyl was changed every three days.
RESULTS: After 2 weeks. The mean pain intensity of the 459 evaluated patients decreased significantly from 5.63±1.26 to 2.03±1.46 (P<0.0001). The total remission rate was 91.29%, of which moderate remission rate 53.16%, obvious remission rate 25.49% and complete remission rate 12.64%. The rate of adverse events was 33.75%, 18.78% of which were moderate and 3.80% were severe. The most frequent adverse events were constipation and nausea. No fatal events were observed. The quality of life was remarkably improved after the treatment (P<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The new TDF is effective and safe in treating patients with moderate to severe cancer pain, and can significantly improve the quality of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer pain; Efficacy; Quality of life; Safety; Transdermal fentanyl matrix patch (TDF)

Year:  2011        PMID: 23359267      PMCID: PMC3551305          DOI: 10.1007/s11670-011-0317-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res        ISSN: 1000-9604            Impact factor:   5.087


  32 in total

1.  Comparative bioequivalence study between a novel matrix transdermal delivery system of fentanyl and a commercially available reservoir formulation.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Marier; Mary Lor; Josée Morin; Lionel Roux; Marika Di Marco; Gaetano Morelli; Eva Aggerholm Saedder
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Long-term treatment of cancer pain with transdermal fentanyl.

Authors:  B Donner; M Zenz; M Strumpf; M Raber
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Transdermal fentanyl versus sustained-release oral morphine in cancer pain: preference, efficacy, and quality of life. The TTS-Fentanyl Comparative Trial Group.

Authors:  S Ahmedzai; D Brooks
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Stories of cancer pain: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Michelle Winslow; Jane Seymour; David Clark
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Transdermal fentanyl in opioid-naive cancer pain patients: an open trial using transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of chronic cancer pain in opioid-naive patients and a group using codeine.

Authors:  A P Vielvoye-Kerkmeer; C Mattern; M P Uitendaal
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Transdermal fentanyl in children with cancer pain: feasibility, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic correlates.

Authors:  J J Collins; I J Dunkel; S K Gupta; C E Inturrisi; J Lapin; L N Palmer; S M Weinstein; R K Portenoy
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Absorption characteristics of transdermally administered fentanyl.

Authors:  J R Varvel; S L Shafer; S S Hwang; P A Coen; D R Stanski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of transdermal fentanyl after abdominal hysterectomy. Analgesic, respiratory, and pharmacokinetic effects.

Authors:  A N Sandler; A D Baxter; J Katz; B Samson; M Friedlander; P Norman; G Koren; S Roger; K Hull; J Klein
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Guidelines for the clinical use of transdermal fentanyl.

Authors:  R Payne; S Chandler; M Einhaus
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.248

10.  Lack of analgesic effect of opioids on neuropathic and idiopathic forms of pain.

Authors:  S Arnér; B A Meyerson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  2 in total

1.  Consensus-Based Guidance on Opioid Management in Individuals With Advanced Cancer-Related Pain and Opioid Misuse or Use Disorder.

Authors:  Katie Fitzgerald Jones; Dmitry Khodyakov; Robert Arnold; Hailey Bulls; Emily Dao; Jennifer Kapo; Diane Meier; Judith Paice; Jane Liebschutz; Christine Ritchie; Jessica Merlin
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 33.006

Review 2.  Management of cancer pain: 1. Wider implications of orthodox analgesics.

Authors:  Susannah K Lee; Jill Dawson; Jack A Lee; Gizem Osman; Maria O Levitin; Refika Mine Guzel; Mustafa Ba Djamgoz
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2014-01-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.