Literature DB >> 18681493

Fentanyl transdermal matrix patch (Durotep MT patch; Durogesic DTrans; Durogesic SMAT): in adults with cancer-related pain.

Sheridan M Hoy1, Gillian M Keating.   

Abstract

The fentanyl transdermal matrix patch is approved in Japan for the management of moderate to severe cancer-related pain in adults. Bioequivalence, in terms of exposure and the maximum and minimum serum concentrations, has been established between the fentanyl transdermal matrix patch 16.8 mg (100microg/h) and the fentanyl transdermal reservoir patch 10 mg (100microg/h) after single and multiple applications. The fentanyl transdermal matrix patch 2.1-8.4 mg (12.5-50microg/h) effectively managed chronic cancer-related pain in adults in a noncomparative, multicentre, phase II study; 89.4% of recipients rated their global assessment of pain as 'very satisfied', 'satisfied' or 'neither satisfied nor dissatisfied'. Adults with cancer- or non-cancer-related chronic pain were switched from fentanyl transdermal reservoir patch to fentanyl transdermal matrix patch therapy without compromising efficacy; no differences in pain intensity or sleep interference scores were seen between the two formulations in an nonblind, multicentre, switching pilot study. Given the nature of the therapy, the tolerability profile of the fentanyl transdermal matrix patch was generally acceptable. Topical adverse events included erythema, application-site irritation and pruritus. In general, patients and physicians preferred the fentanyl transdermal matrix patch over the fentanyl transdermal reservoir patch in the pilot study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18681493     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200868120-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  21 in total

1.  Evaluation of the bioequivalence of two transdermal fentanyl systems following single and repeat applications.

Authors:  Gayatri Sathyan; Cindy Guo; Krishna Sivakumar; Shalini Gidwani; Suneel Gupta
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.580

2.  The effects of morphine- and nalorphine- like drugs in the nondependent and morphine-dependent chronic spinal dog.

Authors:  W R Martin; C G Eades; J A Thompson; R E Huppler; P E Gilbert
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Transdermal fentanyl versus sustained-release oral morphine in cancer pain: preference, efficacy, and quality of life. The TTS-Fentanyl Comparative Trial Group.

Authors:  S Ahmedzai; D Brooks
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  [Permeation of active morphine-like substances at their sites of antinociceptive action in the brain as a function of their lipid-solubility following intravenous and intraventricular application].

Authors:  B von Cube; H Teschemacher; A Herz; R Hess
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmakol       Date:  1970

5.  A comparison of the skin irritation potential of transdermal fentanyl versus transdermal buprenorphine in middle-aged to elderly healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier; Rolf Pokorny; Urs E Gasser; Ute Richarz
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.580

6.  Molecular cloning and functional expression of a mu-opioid receptor from rat brain.

Authors:  Y Chen; A Mestek; J Liu; J A Hurley; L Yu
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 7.  Practical guide to opioids and their complications in managing cancer pain. What oncologists need to know.

Authors:  Mellar P Davis; Wael Lasheen; Pamela Gamier
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.990

8.  Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic study of a novel fentanyl-containing matrix transdermal patch system in Japanese patients with cancer pain.

Authors:  Toyo Miyazaki; Kazuo Hanaoka; Akiyoshi Namiki; Setsuro Ogawa; Toshimitsu Kitajima; Toyoshi Hosokawa; Tomozo Ishida; Shoji Nogami; Shigeto Mashimo
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Transdermal fentanyl: a new step on the therapeutic ladder.

Authors:  B Donner; M Zenz
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.248

10.  Possible involvement of mu1-opioid receptors in the fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception at supraspinal and spinal sites.

Authors:  Minoru Narita; Satoshi Imai; Yumiko Itou; Yoshinori Yajima; Tsutomu Suzuki
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 5.037

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System: A Review in Acute Postoperative Pain.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Transdermal matrix fentanyl membrane patch (matrifen): in severe cancer-related chronic pain.

Authors:  Philip I Hair; Gillian M Keating; Kate McKeage
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Fentanyl Buccal Soluble Film: A Review in Breakthrough Cancer Pain.

Authors:  Karly P Garnock-Jones
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Efficacy of fentanyl transdermal patch in the treatment of chronic soft tissue cancer pain.

Authors:  Karim Hemati; Behrooz Zaman; Valliolah Hassani; Farnad Imani; Parviz Dariaie
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-02-19

5.  Pharmacokinetic study between a bilayer matrix fentalyl patch and a monolayer matrix fentanyl patch: single dose administration in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Ernesto Zecca; Andrea Manzoni; Fabio Centurioni; Alberto Farina; Erminio Bonizzoni; Dan Seiler; Tania Perrone; Augusto Caraceni
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Degradable polymeric vehicles for postoperative pain management.

Authors:  Natasha C Brigham; Ru-Rong Ji; Matthew L Becker
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.