Literature DB >> 16177497

D-IMRT verification with a 2D pixel ionization chamber: dosimetric and clinical results in head and neck cancer.

M Stasi1, S Giordanengo, R Cirio, A Boriano, F Bourhaleb, I Cornelius, M Donetti, E Garelli, I Gomola, F Marchetto, M Porzio, C J Sanz Freire, A Sardo, C Peroni.   

Abstract

Dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (D-IMRT) using the sliding-window technique is currently applied for selected treatments of head and neck cancer at Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment of Candiolo (Turin, Italy). In the present work, a PiXel-segmented ionization Chamber (PXC) has been used for the verification of 19 fields used for four different head and neck cancers. The device consists of a 32x32 matrix of 1024 parallel-plate ionization chambers arranged in a square of 24x24 cm2 area. Each chamber has 0.4 cm diameter and 0.55 cm height; a distance of 0.75 cm separates the centre of adjacent chambers. The sensitive volume of each single ionization chamber is 0.07 cm3. Each of the 1024 independent ionization chambers is read out with a custom microelectronics chip.The output factors in water obtained with the PXC at a depth of 10 cm were compared to other detectors and the maximum difference was 1.9% for field sizes down to 3x3 cm2. Beam profiles for different field dimensions were measured with the PXC and two other types of ionization chambers; the maximum distance to agreement (DTA) in the 20-80% penumbra region of a 3x3 cm2 field was 0.09 cm. The leaf speed of the multileaf collimator was varied between 0.07 and 2 cm s-1 and the detector response was constant to better than 0.6%. The behaviour of the PXC was measured while varying the dose rate between 0.21 and 1.21 Gy min-1; the mean difference was 0.50% and the maximum difference was 0.96%. Using fields obtained with an enhanced dynamic wedge and a staircase-like (step) IMRT field, the PXC has been tested for simple 1D modulated beams; comparison with film gave a maximum DTA of 0.12 cm. The PXC was then used to check four different IMRT plans for head and neck cancer treatment: cervical chordoma, parotid, ethmoid and skull base. In the comparison of the PXC versus film and PXC versus treatment planning system, the number of pixels with gamma parameter<or=1 was 97.7% and 97.6%, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16177497     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/19/017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

1.  Overestimation of low-dose radiation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique.

Authors:  Hilke Vorwerk; Daniela Wagner; Björn Seitz; Hans Christiansen; Hendrik A Wolff; Clemens F Hess
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Dose verification of helical tomotherapy intensity modulated radiation therapy planning using 2D-array ion chambers.

Authors:  S Xu; C Xie; Z Ju; X Dai; H Gong; L Wang; J Yang
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2010-04-01

3.  Two years experience with quality assurance protocol for patient related Rapid Arc treatment plan verification using a two dimensional ionization chamber array.

Authors:  Daniela Wagner; Hilke Vorwerk
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Evaluation of PTW Seven29 for tomotherapy patient-specific quality assurance and comparison with ScandiDos Delta(4).

Authors:  Pamela Myers; Sotirios Stathakis; Alonso N Gutiérrez; Carlos Esquivel; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Niko Papanikolaou
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-04

5.  Feasibility of using two-dimensional array dosimeter for in vivo dose reconstruction via transit dosimetry.

Authors:  Heeteak Chung; Jonathan Li; Sanjiv Samant
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Portal dosimetry for pretreatment verification of IMRT plan: a comparison with 2D ion chamber array.

Authors:  Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma; Vaibav Mhatre; Malhotra Heigrujam; Kaustav Talapatra; Suman Mallik
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Sensitivity of array detector measurements in determining shifts of MLC leaf positions.

Authors:  Qingyang Shang; Andrew Godley; Long Huang; Peng Qi; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  VMAT linear accelerator commissioning and quality assurance: dose control and gantry speed tests.

Authors:  Michael P Barnes; Pejman Rowshanfarzad; Peter B Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Shimohigashi; Fujio Araki; Hirofumi Tominaga; Junichi Sakata; Keiichi Kawasaki; Nagisa Kanetake; Yuki Iwashita; Saori Yoshimura; Tamami Kawakami; Terunobu Ishihara; Tomoko Okuda; Kasei Kogo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Beam perturbation characteristics of a 2D transmission silicon diode array, Magic Plate.

Authors:  Ziyad A Alrowaili; Michael L F Lerch; Marco Petasecca; Martin G Carolan; Peter E Metcalfe; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.