Literature DB >> 16177495

Correction of artefacts in optical projection tomography.

Johnathon R Walls1, John G Sled, James Sharpe, R Mark Henkelman.   

Abstract

A new imaging technique called optical projection tomography (OPT), essentially an optical version of x-ray computed tomography (CT), provides molecular specificity, cellular resolution and larger specimen coverage ( approximately 1 cubic centimetre) than was previously possible with other imaging techniques. It is ideally suited to gene expression studies in small animals. Reconstructed OPT images demonstrate several artefacts which reduce the overall image quality. In this paper, we describe methods to prevent smear artefacts due to illumination intensity fluctuation, ring artefacts due to CCD pixel sensitivity variation and a new 'detector edge' artefact caused by non-zero background signal. We also present an automated method to align the position of the rotational axis during image reconstruction. Finally, we propose a method to eliminate bowl artefacts due to projection truncation using a lower resolution OPT scan of the same specimen. This solution also provides OPT with the ability to obtain a high-resolution reconstruction from a region of interest of a specimen that is larger than the field of view. Implementation of these corrections and modifications increases the accuracy of the OPT imaging technique and extends its capabilities to obtain higher resolution data from within a whole specimen.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16177495     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/19/015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  23 in total

1.  Live optical projection tomography.

Authors:  Jean-François Colas; James Sharpe
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Improved tomographic reconstructions using adaptive time-dependent intensity normalization.

Authors:  Valeriy Titarenko; Sofya Titarenko; Philip J Withers; Francesco De Carlo; Xianghui Xiao
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.616

3.  Visualizing plant development and gene expression in three dimensions using optical projection tomography.

Authors:  Karen Lee; Jerome Avondo; Harris Morrison; Lilian Blot; Margaret Stark; James Sharpe; Andrew Bangham; Enrico Coen
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Comparison of two detector systems for cone beam CT small animal imaging - a preliminary study.

Authors:  Yang Meng; Chris C Shaw; Xinming Liu; Mustafa C Altunbas; Tianpeng Wang; Lingyun Chen; Shu-Ju Tu; S Cheenu Kappadath; Chao-Jen Lai
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2006-03-02

5.  Optofluidic Tomography on a Chip.

Authors:  Serhan O Isikman; Waheb Bishara; Hongying Zhu; Aydogan Ozcan
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D imaging of hydrogels.

Authors:  Edite Figueiras; Ana M Soto; Danilo Jesus; M Lehti; J Koivisto; J E Parraga; J Silva-Correia; J M Oliveira; R L Reis; M Kellomäki; J Hyttinen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Automated deep-phenotyping of the vertebrate brain.

Authors:  Amin Allalou; Yuelong Wu; Mostafa Ghannad-Rezaie; Peter M Eimon; Mehmet Fatih Yanik
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Optical projection tomography for rapid whole mouse brain imaging.

Authors:  David Nguyen; Paul J Marchand; Arielle L Planchette; Julia Nilsson; Miguel Sison; Jérôme Extermann; Antonio Lopez; Marcin Sylwestrzak; Jessica Sordet-Dessimoz; Anja Schmidt-Christensen; Dan Holmberg; Dimitri Van De Ville; Theo Lasser
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Three-dimensional imaging of xenograft tumors using optical computed and emission tomography.

Authors:  Mark Oldham; Harshad Sakhalkar; Tim Oliver; Ying Min Wang; John Kirpatrick; Yiting Cao; Cristian Badea; G Allan Johnson; Mark Dewhirst
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Improving the quantitative accuracy of optical-emission computed tomography by incorporating an attenuation correction: application to HIF1 imaging.

Authors:  E Kim; J Bowsher; A S Thomas; H Sakhalkar; M Dewhirst; M Oldham
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.