Literature DB >> 16176791

Cavitation detection during shock-wave lithotripsy.

Michael R Bailey1, Yuri A Pishchalnikov, Oleg A Sapozhnikov, Robin O Cleveland, James A McAteer, Nathan A Miller, Irina V Pishchalnikova, Bret A Connors, Lawrence A Crum, Andrew P Evan.   

Abstract

A system was built to detect cavitation in pig kidney during shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) with a Dornier HM3 lithotripter. Active detection using echo on B-mode ultrasound, and passive cavitation detection using coincident signals on confocal orthogonal receivers, were used to interrogate the renal collecting system (urine) and the kidney parenchyma (tissue). Cavitation was detected in urine immediately upon shock-wave (SW) administration in urine or urine plus X-ray contrast agent but, in native tissue, cavitation required hundreds of SWs to initiate. Localization of cavitation was confirmed by fluoroscopy, sonography and by thermally marking the kidney using the passive cavitation detection receivers as high-intensity focused ultrasound sources. Cavitation collapse times in tissue and native urine were about the same, but less than in urine after injection of X-ray contrast agent. The finding that cavitation occurs in kidney tissue is a critical step toward determining the mechanisms of tissue injury in SWL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16176791     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  29 in total

1.  Observations of the collapses and rebounds of millimeter-sized lithotripsy bubbles.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Lawrence A Crum; Michael R Bailey; Oleg A Sapozhnikov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Impact of stone removal on renal function: a review.

Authors:  Kyle Wood; Tristan Keys; Patrick Mufarrij; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

3.  Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; James C Williams; Irina V Pishchalnikova; R Jason Vonderhaar
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

5.  A cumulative shear mechanism for tissue damage initiation in shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freund; Tim Colonius; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  [The future of ESWL].

Authors:  K U Köhrmann; D Neisius; J Rassweiler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Cavitation selectively reduces the negative-pressure phase of lithotripter shock pulses.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; Irina V Pishchalnikova; James C Williams; James A McAteer
Journal:  Acoust Res Lett Online       Date:  2005-11-03

8.  Shock-induced bubble jetting into a viscous fluid with application to tissue injury in shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J B Freund; R K Shukla; A P Evan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Probability of cavitation for single ultrasound pulses applied to tissues and tissue-mimicking materials.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Evidence of Microbubbles on Kidney Stones in Humans.

Authors:  Julianna C Simon; James R Holm; Jeffrey Thiel; Barbrina Dunmire; Bryan W Cunitz; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.