Literature DB >> 16176376

Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes.

Rebecca Nicholson1, Frini Karayanidis, Dane Poboka, Andrew Heathcote, Patricia T Michie.   

Abstract

Recent studies show a differential switch-related positivity emerging before a switch trial and reflecting anticipatory task-set reconfiguration processes. In this study, the switch-related positivity was examined in a cued task-switching paradigm. Cue-stimulus and response-stimulus intervals were independently manipulated to dissociate between the effects of anticipatory preparation and passive dissipation of task-set interference. Reaction time switch cost declined with increasing cue-stimulus and response-stimulus intervals, suggesting a contribution from both active preparation and passive interference processes. In cue-related difference waveforms, a switch positivity peaked around 350-400 ms and is interpreted as reflecting differential activation of task-set reconfiguration. In stimulus-related difference waveforms, a switch-related negativity is believed to indicate the role of S-R priming and response interference in task-switching.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16176376     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00350.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  44 in total

1.  Brain oscillatory activity associated with task switching and feedback processing.

Authors:  Toni Cunillera; Lluís Fuentemilla; Jose Periañez; Josep Marco-Pallarès; Ulrike M Krämer; Estela Càmara; Thomas F Münte; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  The many faces of preparatory control in task switching: reviewing a decade of fMRI research.

Authors:  Hannes Ruge; Sharna Jamadar; Uta Zimmermann; Frini Karayanidis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Anticipatory reconfiguration elicited by fully and partially informative cues that validly predict a switch in task.

Authors:  Frini Karayanidis; Elise L Mansfield; Kasey L Galloway; Janette L Smith; Alexander Provost; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Ulrich Mayr; Frank Rösler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  The effect of feedback schedule manipulation on speech priming patterns and reaction time.

Authors:  Dana Slocomb; Kristie A Spencer
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-09-12

6.  A brain-potential study of preparation for and execution of a task-switch with stimuli that afford only the relevant task.

Authors:  Heike Elchlepp; Aureliu Lavric; Guy A Mizon; Stephen Monsell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Are there control processes, and (if so) can they be studied?

Authors:  Glenn R Wylie; James F Sumowski; Micah Murray
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-29

8.  "Smart inhibition": electrophysiological evidence for the suppression of conflict-generating task rules during task switching.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Shulan Hsieh; Chi-Chih Chang
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Immediate versus delayed control demands elicit distinct mechanisms for instantiating proactive control.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Janowich; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Characterizing switching and congruency effects in the Implicit Association Test as reactive and proactive cognitive control.

Authors:  Joseph Hilgard; Bruce D Bartholow; Cheryl L Dickter; Hart Blanton
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.